Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
from 01.01.2018 until now
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
from 01.01.2013 until now
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
from 01.01.2020 until now
First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov (Faculty of Dentistry)
Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
UDK 616.31 Стоматология. Заболевания ротовой полости и зубов
Subject. Suture materials used during the “tooth extraction” operation at the Department of Surgical Dentistry of the Institute of Dentistry named after. E.V. Borovsky, First Moscow State Medical University named after I.M. Sechenov, from 2021 to 2024, and their microbial contamination in the oral cavity. Objectives. Identification of the most commonly used suture materials that is least susceptible to bacterial contamination on the socket of an extracted tooth in the postoperative period. Methodology. Based on the Department of Surgical Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry named after E.V. Borovsky, Sechenov University, conducted two sequential studies: analysis of 74 outpatient records of patients for 2022–2024, who underwent tooth extraction surgery, to identify groups of the most used suture materials; microbiological examination of 4 types of suture material, 12 samples each (n = 48) on the 7th day after removing the suture from the socket of the extracted tooth. Results. According to the results of chart analysis, after tooth extraction surgery, a suture was placed on the socket in 43 patients (58.10%): polypropylene – 10 threads (23.56%); polyglycolide – 5 threads (11.63%); natural material – 1 thread (2.33%); polyamide – 10 threads (23.56%); caprolactam – 13 threads (30.23%); polytetrafluoroethylene – 4 threads (9.30%). Based on these data, a list of suture materials used for further research was compiled: polypropylene, polylactide, polyglycolide. According to the results of a microbiological study of the most frequently encountered microorganisms (Rothia mucilaginosa, Str. Sanguinis, S. epidermidis) as well as the total bacteriological contamination of the suture material on day 7, monofilament suture materials made of polypropylene and caprolactam were less prone to the formation of bacterial plaque (p < 0.05) compared to polyglycolide materials. Conclusion. The materials of choice during tooth extraction surgery, as they are least susceptible to microbial adhesion, can be monofilament surgical threads.
suture material, tooth extraction, microbial contamination of the tooth socket, contamination of suture material, microbiological examination
1. Pravosudova N.A., Mel'nikov V.L. Mikrobiologiya polosti rta. Uchebnoe posobie. Penza. 2013:89. [N.A. Pravosudova, V.L. Melnikov. Microbiology of the oral cavity. Tutorial. Penza. 2013:89. (In Russ.)]. https://dep_medeiib.pnzgu.ru/files/dep_medeiib.pnzgu.ru/for_site/students/digital_library/dl00000003.pdf
2. Katola V.M., Tarasenko S.V., Komogorceva V.E. Vliyanie mikrobioty polosti rta na razvitie vospaleniya i somaticheskih zabolevaniy. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2018;22(3):162-165. [V.M. Katola, S.V. Tarasenko, V.E. Komogortseva. The influence of oral microbiota on the development of inflammation and somatic diseases. Russian dental journal. 2018;22(3):162-165. (In Russ.)]. http://dx.doi. org/10.18821/1728-2802-2018-22-3-162-165
3. Tamarova E.R., Mavzyutov A.R. Kliniko laboratornye paralleli mezhdu vidovym sostavom mikrobioty polosti rta i obschesomaticheskoy patologiey u bol'nyh parodontitom. Permskiy medicinskiy zhurnal. 2014;3I(6):68-73. [E.R. Tamarova, A.R. Mavzyutov. Clinical and laboratory parallels between the species composition of the oral microbiota and general somatic pathology in patients with periodontitis. Perm Medical Journal. 2014;3I(6):68-73. (In Russ.)]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kliniko-laboratornye-paralleli-mezhdu-vidovym-sostavom-mikrobioty-polosti-rta-i-obschesomaticheskoy-patologiey-u-bolnyh-parodontitom/viewer
4. Zlobina O.V., Bugaeva I.O., Gluhova I.V., Gluhova A.V, Pichhidze S.Ya. Eksperimental'naya modifikaciya i issledovanie antibakterial'nogo hirurgicheskogo shovnogo materiala. Sibirskoe medicinskoe obozrenie. 2023;1(139):51-56. [O.V. Zlobina, I.O. Bugaeva, I.V. Glukhova, A.V. Glukhova, S.Ya. Pichkhidze. Experimental modification and study of antibacterial surgical suture material. Siberian Medical Review. 2023;1(139):51-56. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.20333/25000136-2023-1-51-56
5. Knyazyuk A.S., Boncevich D.N., Shevchenko N.I. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika antibakterial'noy aktivnosti novogo biologicheski aktivnogo shovnogo materiala. Problemy zdorov'ya i ekologii. 2017;4(54):106-110. [A.S. Knyazyuk, D.N. Bontsevich, N.I. Shevchenko. Comparative characteristics of the antibacterial activity of a new biologically active suture material. Health and environmental problems. 2017;4(54):106-110. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.51523/2708-6011.2017-14-4-22
6. Pleshkov V.V. Issledovanie mehanicheskih svoystv rassasyvayuschihsya i nerassasyvayuschihsya shovnyh materialov. Smolenskiy medicinskiy al'manah. 2021;3:80-84. [V.V. Pleshkov. Study of mechanical properties of absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials. Smolensk Medical Almanac. 2021;3:80-84. (In Russ.)]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-mehanicheskih-svoystv-rassasyvayuschihsya-i-nerassasyvayuschihsya-shovnyh-materialov/viewer
7. Romanenko N.V., Schetinina E.V., Bondar' I.M. Klinicheskoe obosnovanie primeneniya monofilamentnogo sinteticheskogo shovnogo materiala pri oformlenii hirurgicheskoy rany v polosti rta. Nauka i obrazovanie: luchshie proekty i issledovaniya 2023. Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo konkursa. Penza : Nauka i Prosveschenie. 2023:55-60. [N.V. Romanenko, E.V. Shchetinina, I.M. Bondar. Clinical rationale for the use of monofilament synthetic suture material when decorating a surgical wound in the oral cavity. Science and education: the best projects and research 2023. Collection of articles from the International Research Competition. Penza : Science and Enlightenment. 2023:55-60. (In Russ.)]. https://www.apexdental.ru/stati/klinicheskoe-obosnovanie-ispolzovaniya-shovnogo-materiala-proizvodstva-kompanii-medin-n-/
8. Pershukov A.V. Shovnyy material v stomatologii. Scientist. 2021;2(16):80-85. [A.V. Pershukov. Suture material in dentistry. Scientist. 2021;2(16):80-85. (In Russ.)]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/shovnyy-material-v-stomatologii
9. Pchelyakov A.A., D'yachkova E.Yu., Pchelyakova M.A. i dr. Eksperimental'noe obosnovanie primeneniya shovnyh materialov pri operacii “udalenie zuba”. Head and neck. Russian Journal. 2022;10(2(2)):126-129. [A.A. Pchelyakov, E.Yu. Dyachkova, M.A. Pchelyakova et al. Experimental substantiation of the use of suture materials in the operation of “tooth extraction”. Head and neck. Russian Journal. 2022;10(2(2)):126-129. (In Russ.)]. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.25792/HN.2022.10.2.S2.126-129
10. Abullais S.S., Alqahtani N.A., Alkhulban R.M., Alamer S.H., Khan A.A., Pimple S. In-vitro evaluation of commonly used beverages on tensile strength of different suture materials used in dental surgeries // Medicine (Baltimore). – 2020;99(48):e19831. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019831. PMID: 33235053;
11. Asher R., Chacartchi T., Tandlich M., Shapira L., Polak D. Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study // Clin Oral Investig. – 2019;23(2):559-565. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2476-0. PMID: 29717362.
12. Balamurugan R., Mohamed M., Pandey V., Katikaneni H.K.R., Kumar K.A. Clinical and histological comparison of polyglycolic acid suture with black silk suture after minor oral surgical procedure // J Contemp Dent Pract. – 2012;13(4):521-527. doi:https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1179.
13. Davis B., Smith K.D. Oral Surgery Suturing. 2023 May 29. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL). StatPearls Publishing. 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK572089/
14. Dragovic M., Pejovic M., Stepic J., Colic S., Dozic B., Dragovic S., Lazarevic M., Nikolic N., Milasin J., Milicic B. Comparison of four different suture materials in respect to oral wound healing, microbial colonization, tissue reaction and clinical features-randomized clinical study // Clin Oral Investig. – 2020;24(4):1527-1541. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03034-4.
15. Faris A., Khalid L., Hashim M., Yaghi S., Magde T., Bouresly W., Hamdoon Z., Uthman A.T., Marei H., Al-Rawi N. Characteristics of Suture Materials Used in Oral Surgery: Systematic Review // Int Dent J. – 2022;72(3):278-287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2022.02.005.
16. Kandathil A.M., Aslam S.A., Abidha R., Cherian M.P., Soman S., Sudarsanan M. Evaluation of Microbial Adherence on Antibacterial Suture Materials during Intraoral Wound Healing: A Prospective Comparative Study // J Contemp Dent Pract. – 2023;24(8):515-520. doi:https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3553.
17. Nadafpour N., Montazeri M., Moradi M., Ahmadzadeh S., Etemadi A. Bacterial Colonization on Different Suture Materials Used in Oral Implantology: A Randomized Clinical Trial // Front Dent. – 2021;18:25. doi:https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v18i25.6935. PMID: 35965706.
18. Sagana M., Ahmed N., Ganapathy D., Maiti S., Pandurangan K.K. Awareness of usage of Vicryl suture material in oral surgical procedures // J Adv Pharm Technol Res. – 2022;13(2):S397-S401. doi:https://doi.org/10.4103/japtr.japtr_381_22. PMID: 36798548.
19. Taysi A.E., Taysi N.M., Sismanoglu S. Does Knot Configuration Improve Tensile Characteristics of Monofilament Suture Materials? // J Oral Maxillofac Surg. – 2023;81(1):72-79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.09.006. PMID: 36209892.
