employee
Veliky Novgorod, Veliky Novgorod, Russian Federation
employee
Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
UDK 616.31 Стоматология. Заболевания ротовой полости и зубов
The subject of the study is a method for assessing the quality of implant prosthetics. The goal is to develop a method for patient self-assessment of the condition of peri-implant tissues. Methodology. Two computer programs developed at the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry of the First St. Petersburg State Medical University served as an analogue and prototype for the development of a visual analogue scale (VAS). acad. I.P. Pavlova: “KULOS” “Comprehensive assessment of the tissues of the prosthetic bed and the quality of dental and jaw prostheses” (Trezubov V.N. et al., 2008) and “PARMIT” “Automated portable visual analogue scale (VAS)” (Trezubov V.N. et al., 2023).Clinical testing of the developed scale was carried out. The study involved 48 people (11 men, 37 women) aged from 48 to 65 years (average age 58.2 ± 4.8 years). Statistical processing of materials was carried out using SAS v9.4 software. Results. This scale is intended for patients to self-assess the condition of peri-implant tissues. Completed by us as a questionnaire, it actually represents a six-step visual analogue scale – VAS. Successful initial clinical validation of the method was carried out. Parallel use of the questionnaire by Wolfart S. (2006) and Mericske-Stern R. et al. in the same patients. (2009), “PARMIT” (Trezubov V.N. et al., 2023) demonstrated a reliable general direction and an average degree of closeness of these questionnaires with the author’s method (respectively: r_1 = 0.468; r_2 = 0.573; r_3 = 0.698). Conclusions. A method for patient self-assessment of the condition of peri-implant tissues has been developed. The proposed method can be used in expert assessment of the quality of implant prosthetics.
implantation prosthesis, gingival cuff, questionnaire, scale, questionnaire, peri-implant tissue
1. Mishnev M.L., Trezubov V.N., Rozov R.A., Tkacheva O.N. i dr. Komp'yuternaya programma skriningovoy ocenki «TREMISh» dlya planirovaniya podgotovki polosti rta pozhilyh pacientov k implantacionnomu protezirovaniyu. Svidetel'stvo RosPatenta o gos. registracii programmy dlya EVM №2022666160 ot 25 avgusta 2022 g. [M.L. Mishnev, V.N. Trezubov, R.A. Rozov, O.N. Tkacheva et al. Computer program for screening assessment "TREMISH" for planning the preparation of the oral cavity of elderly patients for implant prosthetics. Certificate of RosPatent on the state. registration of the computer program No. 2022666160 dated August 25, 2022. (In Russ.)]. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49444272
2. Mishnev M.L., Parshin Yu.V., Trezubov V.N. Avtomatizirovannaya portativnaya vizual'no-analogovaya shkala (VASh) «PARMIT». Svidetel'stvo RosPatenta o gos. registracii novoy komp'yuternoy programmy №2023610578 ot 05.12.2022 g. [M.L. Mishnev, Yu.V. Parshin, V.N. Trezubov. Automated portable visual analogue scale (VAS) “PARMIT”. RosPatent certificate of state registration. registration of a new computer program No. 2023610578 dated 12.05.2022. (In Russ.)]. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=50133444
3. Trezubov V.N., Volkovoy O.A. Komp'yuternaya programmy ekspertnoy ocenki kachestva zubnogo implantacionnogo protezirovaniya «TREVOL». Svidetel'stvo RosPatenta o gos. registracii novoy komp'yuternoy programmy №2017663483 ot 05.12.2017 g. [V.N. Trezubov, O.A. Volkovoy. Computer program for expert assessment of the quality of dental implant prosthetics "TREVOL". Certificate of RosPatent on the state. registration of a new computer program No. 2017663483 dated 05.12.2017. (In Russ.)]. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39374276
4. Trezubov V.N., Simonenko A.A., Rozov R.A. i dr. Programma ocenki kachestva implantacionnogo lecheniya «TRESIM». Svid. o gos. registracii programmy dlya EVM №2019661193 ot 21.08.2019 g. [V.N. Trezubov, A.A. Simonenko, R.A. Rozov et al. The program for assessing the quality of implantation treatment "TRESIM". Certificate. about Mrs. registration of the computer program No. 2019661193 dated 08/21/2019. (In Russ.)]. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40879869
5. Aefadda S., Hard N.A., David L. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures // Int. J.Prosthodont. - 2009;22:368-373. PMID: 19639074
6. Allen P., McMillan A. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures // Clin. Oral Implants Res. - 2003;14:173-179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140206.x
7. Attard N., Diacono M. Early loading of fixture original implants with mandibular overdentures: a preliminary report on a prospective study // Int. J.Prosthodont. - 2010;23:507-512. PMID: 21209984
8. Bassi F., Carr A., Ting-Ling Chang, Estafarous E. et al. Functional outcomes for clinical evaluation of implant restoration // Int. J.Prosthodont. - 2013;26(5):411-418. doi:https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3404
9. Esposito M., Crusovin M., Wothington H. Agreement of quantitative subjective evaluation of esthetic changes in implant dentistry by patients and practioners // Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac.Implants. - 2009;24:309-315. PMID: 19492647
10. Kimoto S., Kimoto K., Murakami H. et al. Effect of an acrylic resin-based resilient liner applied to mandibular complete dentures on satisfaction ratings among edentulous patients // Int. J.Prosthodont. - 2014;27(6):561-566. doi:https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3935
11. Mericske-Stern R., Probst D., Fahrländer F., Schellenberg M. Within-subject comparison of two regid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients’ satisfaction and prosthetic results // Clin. Implant. Dent. Relat Res. - 2009;11:228-237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00109.x
12. Mombelli A., Lang N. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis // Periodontol. - 2000;17:63-76. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280107.x
13. Pjetursson B., Bragger U., Lang N., Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FPDs) and implant-supported FPDs and single crowns (Scs) // Clin. Oral Implants Res. - 2007;18(3):97-113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01439.x
14. Pjetursson B. et al. Patient satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective study // Clin. Oral Implants Res. - 2005;16(2):185-193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01094.x
15. Santucci D., Camilleri L., Kobayashi Y., Attard N. Development of a Maltese version of oral health-associated questionnaires: OHIP-14, GOHAI, and Denture-Satisfaction Questionnaire // Int. J. Prosthodont. - 2014;27(1):44-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3603
16. Santucci D., Attard N. The Oral Health-related quality of life in state institutionalized older adults in Malta // Int. J. Prosthodont. - 2015;28:402-411. doi:https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4185
17. Schwarz F., Becker J. Peri-implant infection: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Quintessence Publ. Co. Ltd. London ; Berlin. 2010:296. https://search.worldcat.org/title/peri-implant-infection-etiology-diagnosis-and-treatment/oclc/495597136
18. Wegdan Muhammed El-Sayed, Muhammed Ahmed Gd., Ahmed Muhammed Medra. Prosthodontic management of maxilloectomy patients with dental implants in residual zygomatic bone: a preliminary report // Int. J.Prosthodont. - 2014;27(6):534-540. doi:https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3598
19. Wolfart S., Quass A., Freitag S., Kropp P. et al. General well-being as an important co-factor of self-assessment of dental appearance // Int. J. Prosthodont. - 2006;19:449-454. PMID: 17323722
