from 01.01.2017 until now
LLC «Center of Dentistry «32 Practice» (orthodontist)
from 01.01.2018 until now
Perm', Perm, Russian Federation
from 01.01.2010 until now
Perm, Perm, Russian Federation
The beneficial orthodontic treatment should be focused on functional and aesthetic optimum results in dentofacial system achievement. The aim of the study is to evaluate on-treatment changes of mandible size and position in patients with mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism in different periods of dentofacial system evolving. Methodology: the research base of prospective clinical study was Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics Department of E.A. Vagner Perm State Medical University. The object of the study were 102 patients aged 6 to 16 years with distal malocclusion and mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism. All patients were under orthodontic treatment. Study data is lateral cephalograms, recorded before and after orthodontic treatment. Results: orthodontic treatment was most effective in mixed dentition when skeletal effects expressed in total normalization of mandible sagittal position and its significant expansion. In permanent dentition period mandible expansion considerably decreased in CS4 cervical vertebrae stage maturation and was clinically insignificant in CS5 cervical vertebrae stage maturation. Correction of distal malocclusion in permanent dentition had dental effects in clockwise occlusion plane rotation and inclination changing of upper and lower incisors. Conclusions: skeletal effects are leading in treatment of patients with distal malocclusion and mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism in dentofacial system high growth potential cases; dental effects are leading in dentofacial system low growth potential cases.
distal malocclusion, mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism, orthodontic treatment
1. Bimbas E.S., Klevakin A.Yu. Sravnitel'nyy analiz effektivnosti primeneniya apparata Gerbsta i monobloka pri lechenii distal'noy okklyuzii v sochetanii s nes'emnoy ortodonticheskoy tehnikoy. Problemy stomatologii. 2011;3:58-60. [E.S. Bimbas, A.Yu. Klevakin. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the device Herbst and candy bar in the treatment of distal occlusion in conjunction with fixed orthodontic appliances. Actual problems in dentistry. 2011;3:58-60. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16395282
2. Vodolackiy V.M., Makatov R.S. Sravnitel'nyy analiz retencionnogo perioda u pacientov detskogo vozrasta s distal'noy i mezial'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov. Stomatologiya detskogo vozrasta i profilaktika. 2019;3(71):17-20. [V.M. Vodolatsky, R.S. Makatov. Comparative analysis of retention period in children with distal and mesial occlusion of dentition. Pediatric dentistry and prophylaxis. 2019;3(71):17-20. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2019-19-3-17-20
3. Danilova M.A., Ishmurzin P.V., Zaharov S.V. Primenenie geometricheskih modeley verhney i nizhney chelyustey, visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava dlya opisaniya izmeneniy chelyustnogo kompleksa v norme i pri distal'noy okklyuzii. Ortodontiya. 2012;1(57):15-19. [M.A. Danilova, P.V. Ishmurzin, S.V. Zakharov. Use of maxilla, mandible and temporomandibular joint geometrical models of maxillary complex description in norm and at distal occlusion. Orthodontics. 2012;1(57):15-19. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21010109
4. Danilova M.A., Ishmurzin P.V., Zaharov S.V. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie miofunkcional'noy korrekcii sagittal'nyh anomaliy okklyuzii i disfunkcii visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava. Stomatologiya. 2012;3(91):65-69. [M.A. Danilova, P.V. Ishmurzin, S.V. Zakharov. The theoretical substantiation of myofunctional correction of sagittal occlusion abnormalities and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Stomatology. 2012;3(91):65-69. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18022662
5. Ishmurzin P.V., Danilova M.A. Lechenie distal'noy okklyuzii zubnyh ryadov, sochetannoy s disfunkciey visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava. Problemy stomatologii. 2012;1:70-71. [P.V. Ishmurzin, M.A. Danilova. Treatment of distoocclusion combined with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Actual problems in dentistry. 2012;1:70-71. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17651443
6. Kosyuga S.Yu., Sirotkina S.V. Lechenie distal'nogo prikusa u detey. Stomatologiya dlya vseh. 2020;1(90):52-55. [S.Yu. Kosyuga, S.V. Sirotkina. Treatment of distal occlusion in children. International dental review. 2020;1(90):52-55. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.35556/idr-2020-1(90)52-55
7. Megrabyan O.A., Danilova M.A., Ishmurzin P.V., Alekseev E.A. Osobennosti patogeneticheskogo lecheniya pacientov s distal'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov, associirovannoy s retrognatiey nizhney chelyusti. Dental forum. 2018;4:47-48. [O.A. Megrabyan, M.A. Danilova, P.V. Ishmurzin, E.V. Alekseev. Pathogenic treatment characteristics of distal occlusion with mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism. Dental forum. 2018;4:47-48. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36320819
8. Megrabyan O.A., Ishmurzin P.V. Taktika lecheniya retro- i mikrognatii nizhney chelyusti u pacientov s nezavershennym rostom licevogo skeleta. Problemy stomatologii. 2019;15(3):103-109. [O.A. Megrabyan, P.V. Ishmurzin Treatment management of patients with mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism in incompleted facial skeleton growth period. Actual problems in dentistry. 2019;15(3):103-109. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2019-15-3-103-109.
9. Novruzov Z.G., Alieva R.K., Garaev Z.I. Cefalometricheskiy analiz effektivnosti lecheniya distal'nogo prikusa apparatom Frenkel'-2. Stomatologiya. 2020;99(1):49-54. [Z.G. Novruzov, R.K. Aliyeva, Z.I. Garayev. Cephalometric analysis of influence of the Frankel-2 appliance in the treatment of distal malocclusion. Stomatology. 2020;99(1):49-54. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20209901149.
10. Novruzov Z.G., Alieva R.K., Ozdiler O.E. Cefalometricheskaya ocenka vliyaniya s'emnyh funkcional'nyh apparatov, ispol'zuemyh pri lechenii distal'nogo prikusa, na vysotu lica. Stomatologiya. 2018;97(3):44-47. [Z.G. Novruzov, R.K. Alieva, O.E. Ozdiler. Cephalometric evaluation of the effect of dynamax and monoblock appliances on vertical facial height in patients with distal malocclusion. Stomatology. 2018;97(3):44-47. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201897344.
11. Pol'ma L.V., Karpova S.V., Topol'nickaya Ya.O., Fomichev K.A. Obosnovanie primeneniya korrektorov u vzroslyh pacientov s distal'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov. Ortodontiya. 2020;2(90):28-43. [L.V. Polma, V.S. Karpova, Ya.O. Topolnitskaya, K.A. Fomichev. Evidence of use of occlusion correctors in adult class II patients. Orthodontics. 2020;2(90):28-43. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44374379
12. Pol'ma L.V., Markova M.V., Oborotistov N.Yu. Distal'naya okklyuziya zubnyh ryadov: odno ili dvuhetapnoe lechenie? Ortodontiya. 2013;2(62):14-25. [L.V. Polma, M.V. Markova, N.Yu. Oborotistov. Analysis of orthodontic treatment of patients with distal occlusion: one-or two-stage treatment? Orthodontics. 2013;2(62):14-25. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21012976
13. Pol'ma L.V., Markova M.V., Persin L.S. Vybor optimal'nogo vremeni lecheniya pacientov s distal'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov na osnovanii ocenki stadiy sozrevaniya pozvonkov sheynogo otdela. Ortodontiya. 2011;4(56):22-30. [L.V. Polma, M.V. Markova, L.S. Persin. Determining the optimal time for patients with distal occlusion by use of cervical vertebral maturation method. Orthodontics. 2011;4(56):22-30. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18760560
14. Popov S.A. Izmenenie licevogo otdela cherepa i myagkih tkaney lica pri sovremennom lechenii distal'noy okklyuzii u podrostkov s razlichnymi zubochelyustnymi anomaliyami. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2011;3(59):84-86. [S.A. Popov. Changes of facial skeleton and soft tissues of face in the course of modern treatment of distal occlusion in teenagers suffering from different dentofacial anomalies. Clinical Dentistry. 2011;3(59):84-86. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22625373
15. Rubnikovich S.P., Kuz'menko E.V., Timchuk Ya.I., Hmazh Z.A., Kalkan E. Effektivnost' primeneniya funkcional'nogo s'emnogo apparata tvin-blok dlya lecheniya skeletnyh form anomaliy prikusa II klassa v period aktivnogo rosta. Stomatolog. Minsk. 2021;1(40):8-19. [S.P. Rubnikovich, E.V. Kuzmenko, Ya.I. Timchuk, Z.A. Khmaj, E. Kalkan. Effectiveness of twin-block functional removable appliance in treating skeletal class II malocclusion during the phase of active skeletal growth. Dentist. Minsk. 2021;1(40):8-19. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44878319
16. Areepong D., Kim K.B., Oliver D.R., Ueno H. The Class II Carriere Motion appliance // The Angle Orthodontist. - 2020;90(4):491-499. https://doi.org/10.2319/080919-523.1
17. Baccetti T., Franchi L., Toth L.R., McNamara Jr. J.A. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2000;118(2):159-170. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.10557
18. Campbell C., Millett D., Kelly N., Cooke M., Cronin M. Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial // The Angle Orthodontist. - 2020;90(2):202-208. https://doi.org/10.2319/042419-290.1.
19. Clark W.J. Twin Blocks designed for 24-hour wear // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 156(3):295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.006.
20. Cozza P., Baccetti T., Franchi L. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2006;129(5):599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010
21. Jena A.K., Duggal R., Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2006;130(5):594-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.025.
22. Lykhota K., Lykhota A., Petrychenko O. Comparison of economic efficiency of orthodontic appliances for treatment of sagittal bite anomalies // Georgian medical news. - 2019;295:48-51. PMID 31804198
23. Mills C.M., McCulloch K.J. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2000;118(1):24-33. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.104902
24. Stefanovic N.L., Uhac M., Brumini M., Zigante M., Perkovic V., Spalj S. Predictors of patient compliance during Class II division 1 malocclusion functional orthodontic treatment // The Angle Orthodontist. - 2021;91(4):502-508. https://doi.org/10.2319/090820-780.1.
25. Taylor K.L., Evangelista K., Muniz L., Ruellas A.C.O. et al. Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study // Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research. - 2020;23(1):72-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12345
26. Veitz-Keenan A., Liu N. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion? // Evidence-Based Dentistry. - 2019;20(2):56-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-019-0035-4.
27. Wright D.M. Twin block functional therapy: a modified technique // Journal of General Orthodontics. - 1998;9(3):10-21. PMID: 10535031
