Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
from 01.01.1992 until now
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Ekaterinburg, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Subject. When prosthetics of toothless jaws are performed, the physiological position of the lower jaw must be determined before the final structures are made. In some cases, the use of temporary prostheses for several weeks may be useful to check for a new occlusion in a centric relationship. When the correct ratio is achieved, it is difficult to transfer them from the preliminary prostheses to the final ones. This article presents a case and a technique used to communicate information about the position of the lower jaw using a digital workflow. To determine the optimal position of the lower jaw, a computer tomogram of the temporomandibular joint was used to mathematically measure the correct position of the head of the lower jaw. Purpose. To describe a technique designed to transfer the inter-occlusal relations of the upper and lower jaws, using digital technologies in the prosthetics of full adentia using dental implants. Methodology. On the example of a clinical case of rehabilitation of a patient, total removal of failed teeth was performed, followed by prosthetics of complete adentia with the installation of six implants on the upper and lower jaws. After the completion of the integration period, a cone-beam computed tomography was performed with the capture of the temporomandibular joint, and a scan of plaster models with installed gum shapers was performed. The obtained data were compared in a specialized program for mathematical calculation of the optimal position of the lower jaw. This information was used to produce registration templates for the manufacture of fixed structures supported by implants in the resulting central jaw ratio. Results. A digital protocol for determining the central ratio of the jaws allowed us to transfer the information obtained in a virtual model of the temporomandibular joint to a permanent restoration based on implants. Conclusion. The approach described in this article predictably conveys information about the optimal position of the lower jaw during prosthetics and allows you to perform the final restoration on implants with optimal occlusal ratios, based on a mathematical calculation performed in specialized programs.
dental implantation, guided surgery, temporomandibular joint, full edentulous, immediate loading, central jaw ratio
1. Agliardi E.L., Romeo D., Panigatti S., de Araújo Nobre M., Maló P. Immediate full-arch rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla supported by zygomatic implants: A prospective clinical study with minimum follow-up of 6 years // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. - 2017;46(12):1592-1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijom.2017.05.023
2. Albdour E.A., Shaheen E., Vranckx M., Mangano F.G., Politis C., Jacobs R. A novel in vivo method to evaluate trueness of digital impressions // BMC Oral Health. - 2018;18:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0580-9
3. Bonnet G., Batisse C., Bessadet M., Nicolas E., Veyrune J.L. A new digital denture procedure: A first practitioners appraisal // BMC Oral Health. - 2017;17:155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0440-z
4. Colombo M., Mangano C., Mijiritsky E., Krebs M., Hauschild U., Fortin T. Clinical applications and effectiveness of guided implant surgery: A critical review based on randomized controlled trials // BMC Oral Health. - 2017;17:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-017-0441-y
5. Correia F., Gouveia S., Felino A.C., Costa A.L., Almeida R.F. Survival rate of dental implants in patients with history of periodontal disease: A retrospective cohort study // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants. - 2017;32(4):927-934. https://doi.org/10.11607/ jomi.3732
6. Ihde S., Palka L., Gaur V., Ihde A. Critical appraisal regarding the publication “Implant Survival between Endo-Osseous Dental Implants in Immediate Loading, delayed loading, and basal immediate loading dental implants: A 3-year follow-up” // Ann Maxillofac Surg. - 2017;7:237-244. https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_122_18
7. Iturrate M., Minguez R., Pradies G., Solaberrieta E. Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant supported complete-arch prosthesis: A dental technique // J. Prosthet. Dent. - 2019;121:237-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.03.008
8. Jacobs R., Salmon B., Codari M., Hassan B., Bornstein M.M. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: Recommendations for clinical use // BMC Oral Health. - 2018;18:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5
9. Mangano F., Mangano C., Margiani B., Admakin O. Combining Intraoral and Face Scans for the Design and Fabrication of Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Implant-Supported Bars for Maxillary Overdentures // Scanning. - 2019;2019:4274715. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4274715
10. Merli M., Bianchini E., Mariotti G., Moscatelli M., Piemontese M., Rappelli G., Nieri M. (2017). Ceramic vs composite veneering of full arch implant-supported zirconium frameworks: Assessing patient preference and satisfaction. A crossover double-blind randomised controlled trial // European Journal of Oral Implantology. - 2017;10(3):311-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01773.x
11. Niedermaier R., Stelzle F., Riemann M., Bolz W., Schuh P., Wachtel H. Implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch dentures: Evaluation of implant survival rates in a case cohort of up to 7 years // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2017;19(1):4-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12421
12. Osnes C.A., Wu J.H., Venezia P., Ferrari M., Keeling A.J. Full arch precision of six intraoral scanners in vitro // J. Prosthodont. Res. - 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.05.005
13. Ozgur G.O., Kazancioglu H.O., Demirtas N., Deger S., Ak G. (2016). Risk factors associated with implant marginal bone loss: A retrospective 6-year follow-up study // Implant Dentistry. - 2016;25(1):122-127. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000366
14. Raico Gallardo Y.N., da Silva-Olivio I.R.T., Mukai E., Morimoto S., Sesma N., Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Clin. Oral Implant. Res. - 2017;28:602-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12841
15. Spielau T., Hauschild U., Katsoulis J. Computer-assisted, template-guided immediate implant placement and loading in the mandible: A case report // BMC Oral Health. - 2019;19:55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0746-0
16. Tahmaseb A., Wu V., Wismeijer D., Coucke W., Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Clin. Oral Implant. Res. - 2018;29;16:416-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13346
17. Tartaglia G.M., Maiorana C., Gallo M., Codari M., Sforza C. Implant-supported immediately loaded full-arch rehabilitations: Comparison of resin and zirconia clinical outcomes in a 5-year retrospective follow-up study // Implant Dentistry. - 2016;25(1):74-82. https://doi. org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000368
18. Unkovskiy A., Wahl E., Zander A.T., Huettig F., Spintzyk S. Intraoral scanning to fabricate complete dentures with functional borders: A proof-of-concept case report // BMC Oral Health. - 2019;19:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0733-5
19. Van Nimwegen W.G., Raghoebar G.M., Tymstra N., Vissink A., Meijer H.J.A. How to treat two adjacent missing teeth with dental implants. A systematic review on single implant-supported two-unit cantilever FDP’s and results of a 5-year prospective comparative study in the aesthetic zone // Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. - 2017;44(6):461-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12507
20. Venezia P., Torsello F. Orientation of digital casts according to facial lines // J. Prosthet. Dent. - 2018;120:964-965. https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2019.11.03.10
21. Wang J.H., Judge R., Bailey D. (2016). A 5-year retrospective assay of implant treatments and complications in private practice: The restorative complications of single and short-span implant-supported fixed prostheses // The International Journal of Prosthodontics. - 2016;29(5):435-444. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4794
22. Zhang X.X., Shi J.Y., Gu Y.X., Lai H.C. Long-term outcomes of early loading of straumann implant-supported fixed segmented bridgeworks in edentulous maxillae: A 10-year prospective study // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. - 2016;18(6):1227-1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12420
23. Grishin P.O., Kalinnikova E.A. Klinicheskie issledovaniya stabil'nosti i processa osteointegracii dental'nyh implantatov pri provedenii neposredstvennoy i otsrochennoy implantacii. Problemy stomatologii. 2020;16(4):97-103. [P.O. Grishin, E.A. Kalinnikova. Clinical studies of the stability and process of osteointegration of dental implants during immediate and delayed implantation. Actual problems in dentistry. 2020;16(4):97-103. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-20-16-4-97-103
24. Saleev R.A., Grishin P.O., Saleeva G.T., Kalinnikova E.A., Mubarakova L.N. Faktory, vliyayuschie na dolgovremennyy uspeh provedeniya dental'noy implantacii. Problemy stomatologii. 2021;17(1):91-98. [R.A. Saleev, P.O. Grishin, G.T. Saleeva, E. Kalinnikova, L.N. Mubarakova. Factors influencing the long-term success of dental implantation. Actual problems in dentistry. 2021;17(1):91-98. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-20-17-1-91-98
25. Zholudev S.E. Nersesyan P.M. Sovremennye znaniya i klinicheskie perspektivy ispol'zovaniya dlya pozicionirovaniya dental'nyh implantatov hirurgicheskih shablonov. Obzor literatury. Problemy stomatologii. 2017;13(4):74-80. [S.E. Zholudev, P.M. Nersesyan. Modern knowledge and clinical perspectives of use for positioning dental implants of surgical templates. Literature review. Actual problems in dentistry. 2017;13(4):74-80. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2017-13-4-74-80
