CLINICAL EVALUATION OF COBALT-CHROMIUM-BASED FIXED DENTURES
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Subject. Ceramic-metal prostheses are distinguished by high wear resistance, resistance to deformation, and tight fit to the gums. However, there are relatively large differences in determining the success / survival of cobalt chromium based restorations. The article presents the results of a study of cobalt-chromium fixed dentures. Objectives — evaluate the effectiveness of cobalt-chromium fixed dentures made using the direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technique. Material and methods. 32 patients (mean age 41.8 ± 2.46 years) were found to have 54 fixed cobalt-chromium fixed bridges made using direct laser sintering of metals. Dentures were evaluated between 6, 12, 24, 36 months according to G. Ryge criteria. The survival rate of restorations is calculated according to Kaplan-Meyer. Results. Assessment of fixed prostheses revealed the absence of criteria C and D in all 3 categories. A comparative analysis of prostheses showed no change in the period 6, 12, 24 months. After 36 months, chips that did not violate the function of the prosthesis were revealed in 5.5 % of cases, visible signs of a cleft in the category of “marginal adaptation” in 1.8 % of cases, edge discoloration of the surface in 3.7 % of cases. Radiographically, 1 patient showed signs of incipient proximal caries and periapical changes, respectively. During the study period of 6-24 months. survival rate was 1.0. The survival of the restoration over a 3-year period was 88.9 %. Conclusion. The frequency of cleavage was 5.5 %, which is comparable to the usual performance of ceramic-metal restorations. The visible signs of a cleft in the regional adaptation was 1.8 %, and the regional color mismatch was 3.7 %. 1.8 % of restoration was detected. Signs of incipient proximal caries were 1.8 %, periapical changes — 1.8 %. Survival was 88.9 %.

Keywords:
fixed dentures, cobalt-chromium, direct laser sintering of metals, G. Ryge criteria, modified criteria, survival
References

1. Gunsoy, S., Ulusoy, M. (2016). Evaluation of marginal/internal fit of chrome-cobalt crowns: Direct laser metal sintering versus computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. Niger J Clin Pract, 19, 636-644. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.188699

2. Suleiman, S. H., Vult von Steyern, P. (2013). Fracture strength of porcelain fused to metal crowns made of cast, milled or laser-sintered cobalt-chromium. Acta Odontol Scand, 71, 1280-1289. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.757650

3. Eliasson, A., Arnelund, C., Johansson, A. (2007). A clinical evaluation of cobalt chromium metal ceramic fixed partial dentures and crowns: A three to seven year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent, 98, 6-16.

4. Makhmudov, M. M., Ashurov, G. G. (2018). Indeksnyye i gidrodinamicheskiye pokazateli tkaney parodonta ka kriteriy rezul'tativnosti lecheniya travmaticheskogo porazheniya tkaney parodonta konstruktsiyami zubnykh protezov [Index and hydrodynamic indicators of periodontal tissues as a criterion for the effectiveness of the treatment of traumatic lesions of periodontal tissues with dental prosthesis designs]. Problemy stomatologii [Dental problems], 13 (2), 64-68. (In Russ.)

5. Kurkina, V. M. (2017). Znacheniye metallokeramicheskikh konstruktsiy v ortopedicheskoy stomatologii [The value of ceramic-metal constructions in orthopedic dentistry]. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki [Scientific Review. Medical sciences], 4, 42-46. (In Russ.)

6. Okamoto, H. (2003). Co-Cr (cobalt-chromium). J Phase Equilib, 24, 377-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105497103770330460

7. Øilo, M., Nesse, H., Lindbetrg, O. J., Gjerdet, N. R. (2018). Mechanical properties of cobalt-chromium 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated by casting, milling, and additive manufacturing. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 120 (1), 156.e1-156.e7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.007

8. Sakanyan, S. S. (2017). Oslozhneniya pri primenenii metallokeramicheskikh protezov. Nauchnoye obozreniye [Complications when using ceramic-metal prostheses]. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki [Scientific Review. Medical sciences], 4, 84-87. (In Russ.)

9. Antonov, E. N., Evdokimov, E. A., Piotrovich, A. V. (2013). Ratsional'nyy vybor konstruktsii proteza zalog uspeshnogo vosstanovleniya zubnogo ryada [The rational choice of the prosthesis design is the key to successful restoration of the dentition]. Problemy stomatologii [Dentistry problems], 5, 24-28. (In Russ.)

10. Timerbulatova, G. A., Ibragimova, I. F., Mannanova, F. F., Galiullina, M. V., Ganeev, T. I., Khasanova, D. R. (2018). Blizhayshiye i otdalennyye rezul'taty proteticheskoy korrektsii meziookklyuzii shtiftovymi konstruktsiyami [The immediate and long-term results of the prosthetic correction of mesio-occlusion with pin designs]. Problemy stomatologii [Dentistry problems], 14 (4), 110-116. (In Russ.)

11. Zafar, N., Ghani, F. (2014). Common post-fitting complications in tooth-supported fixed-fixed design metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. Pak J Med Sci, 30 (3), 619-625. doi:https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.303.5599

12. Aslam, A., Hassan, S. H., Nayyer, M., Ahmed, B. (2018). Intraoral repair protocols for fractured metal-ceramic restorations - Literature review. South African Dental Journal, 73 (1), 35-41.

13. Carlsson, G. E. )2014). Success and failure of different types of crowns and fixed dental prostheses. J Pak Prosthodont Assoc, 2 (01), 25-34.

14. Zhang, Sh., Ma, P., Wang, G., Sun, Q., Tian, L., Ma, L., Xu, B. (2017). Evaluation of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Clin Exp Med, 10 (1), 106-114.

15. Pompa, G., Di Carlo, S., De Angelis, F., Cristalli, M. P., Annibali, S. (2015). Comparison of Conventional Methods and Laser-Assisted Rapid Prototyping for Manufacturing Fixed Dental Prostheses: An In Vitro Study. BioMed Research International, 2015.

16. Overmeer, J., Narby, B., Hjalmarsson, L., Arnrup, K., Eliasson, A. (2016). A retrospective multicenter study comparing metal-ceramic and composite single crowns performed in public general dentistry: 5-year results. Acta Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica, 2 (1), 43-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1136932

17. Sorrentino, R., Leone, R., Leuci, S., Ausiello, P., Zarone, F. (2017). CAD/CAM cobalt-chromium alloy single crowns in posterior regions: 4-year prospective clinical study. J Osseointegr, 9 (3), 282-288. DOI 10.23805 /JO.2017.09.03.03

18. Wu, L., Zhu, H., Gai, X., Wang, Y. (2014). Evaluation of the mechanical properties and porcelain bond strength of cobalt-chromium dental alloy fabricated by selective laser melting. J Prosthet Dent, 111, 51-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.011

19. Takaichi, A., Nakamoto, T., Joko, N., Nomura, N., Tsutsumi, Y. et al. (2013). Microstructures and mechanical properties of Co-29Cr-6Mo alloy fabricated by selective laser melting process for dental applications. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 21, 67-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.01.021

20. Ryge, G. (1980). Clinical criteria. Int Dent J, 30, 347-358.

21. Rumjancev, P. O., Saenko, V. A., Rumjanceva, U. V., Chekin, S. Ju. (2014). Statisticheskiye metody analiza v klinicheskoy praktike [Statistical analysis methods in clinical practice]. Obninsk : GU RMNC RAMN, 46. (In Russ.)

22. Dimitriadis, K., Spyropoulos, K., Papadopoulos, T. (2018). Metal-ceramic bond strength between a feldspathic porcelain and a Co-Cr alloy fabricated with Direct Metal Laser Sintering technique. J Adv Prosthodont, 10 (1), 25-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.1.25.

23. Riaz, W., Ayesha, A., Aziz, S. (2018). Dental prosthesis; assessment of grades of failures of conventional fixed dental prosthesis based on severity. Professional Med J, 25 (8), 1261-1264. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/18.4488

24. Sailer, I., Makarov, N. A., Thoma, D. S., Zwahlen, M., Pjetursson, B. E., Sailer, I., Pjetursson, B. E., Zwahlen, M., Hämmerle, C. H. (2015). All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). Dent Mater, 31 (6), 603-623. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.02.011.

25. Prabhu, R., Prabhu, G., Baskaran, E., Arumugam, E. M. (2016). Clinical acceptability of metal-ceramic fixed partial dental prosthesis fabricated with direct metal laser sintering technique-5 year follow-up. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 16, 193-197.


Login or Create
* Forgot password?