THE STABILITY LEVEL OF DENTAL IMPLANTS IN DIFFERENT PERIODS OF FUNCTIONING
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Predmet. Podvizhnost' i ustoychivost' vnutrikostnyh zubnyh implantatov. Cel'. Opredelenie podvizhnosti i ocenka ustoychivosti vnutrikostnyh implantatov metodom periotesta. Metodologiya. Obsledovano 164 pacienta v vozraste 54,6±4,17 goda. Na verhnyuyu chelyust' ustanovleno 403 implantata, na nizhnyuyu — 238. Po odnoetapnoy metodike ustanovleno 230, po dvuhetapnoy — 411. Issledovaniya provodili srazu posle implantacii, cherez 6 i 12 mes. Ispol'zovan apparat Periotest-M. Pri interpretacii rezul'tatov uchityvali dannye M.M. Uhanova. Statisticheskaya obrabotka vypolnena s ispol'zovaniem programmy Statistica 6.0. Rezul'taty. Pri odnoetapnoy implantacii (230 implantatov, 66 pacientov) srednee znachenie stabil'nosti na moment fiksacii sostavilo -3,48±1,03, v gruppe s dvuhetapnym vidom (411 implantatov, 98 pacientov) — -3,24±1,10. U pacientov s odnoetapnoy implantaciey v verhney chelyusti stabil'nost' po sravneniyu s nachal'noy cherez 6 mes. uluchshilas' na 39,9 (r<0,05), cherez 12 mes. — na 46,3 % (r<0,05). V etoy zhe gruppe v nizhney chelyusti razlichiya mezhdu znacheniyami stabil'nosti v moment implantacii i spustya 6 i 12 mes. sostavili 47,6 (r<0,05) i 53,5 % (r<0,05). U pacientov pri dvuhetapnoy metodike v verhney chelyusti stabil'nost' cherez 6 i 12 mes. po sravneniyu s velichinoy na moment implantacii uvelichilas' na 36,7 (r<0,05) i 44,8 % (r<0,05) sootvetstvenno, v nizhney chelyusti — na 42,9 (r<0,05) i 50,0 % (r<0,05). Razlichiya mezhdu znacheniyami stabil'nosti implantatov v verhney i nizhney chelyustyah ne byli statisticheski znachimymi. Vyvody. Stabil'nost' vnutrikostnyh implantatov sistemy MIS spustya 6 i 12 mes. posle implantacii vozrastaet pri odno- i dvuhetapnoy metodike v verhney i nizhney chelyustyah. Pokazateli stabil'nosti implantatov ukazyvayut na pozitivnyy uroven' osteointegracii.

Keywords:
dental'nyy implantat, osteointegraciya, periotestometriya, odno- i dvuhetapnaya implantaciya, stabil'nost'
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Bayrikov I.M., Monakov D.V., Savelyev A.L., and others. Klinicheskoe primenenie vnutrikostno-nakostnogo implantata so skvoznoy poristostyu v usloviyakh atrofii kostnoy tkani. Sbornik statey Mezhd.-praktich. konfer. “Nauchnye dostizheniya sovremennoy nauki: novatsiya, istoriya, deystvitelnost, perspektivy i praktika realizatsii” [The clinical application of the endosseous-subperiosteal implant with through porosity in the presence of bone atrophy. Collected works of International Scientific-Practical Conference “Scientific achievements of modern science: innovation, history, reality, prospects and practice”], St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg, KultInformPress, 2017. pp. 36-42.

2. Bondarenko N.A., Losev F.F., Bondarenko A.N. [The necessity of dental implantation and frequency of its application] Kubanskij nauchnyj medicinskij vestnik, 2010, no.3-4, pp. 29-32.

3. Derevyankina A.V., Baktybek-kyzy A., Babayan K.S. [Comparison of materials in implant dentistry] Bulletin of medical internet conferences (ISSN 2224-6150), 2015, vol.5, no.11, pp. 1441-1442.

4. Dobrovolskaya O.V. [Study of implant movability by periotest technique] Visnyk ukrainskoi medychnoi stomatolohichnoi akademii = Bulletin of Ukrainian Medical Stomatological Academy, 2009, vol.9, no.4, pp. 172-173.

5. Donskikh D.A. [Failure of implant osseointegration] Bulletin of medical internet conferences (ISSN 2224-6150), 2015, vol.5, no.11, p. 1443.

6. Dronov M.V. [Evaluation of stability and osseointegration of dental implants with the application of a resonance frequency method] The Dental Institute, 2007, no.1, pp. 128-129.

7. Yeroshin V.A., Dzhalalova M.V., Boyko A.V., and others. [Mobility of dental implants: new capability of a known device] Russian Journal of Biomechanics, 2015, vol.19, no.3, pp. 273-281. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15593/RZhBiomeh/2016.3.04.

8. Kuritsyn A.V., Kutsevlyak V.I., Kondratyev A.V. [Final and Element Modelling of Interaction of the Screw Implant with the Bone Tissues of the Maxillary Segment] Bulletin of problems biology and medicine, 2014, no.2, vol.1(107), pp. 202-205.

9. Nikolskiy V.Yu., Razumniy V.A. [Main options of dental implantation and assessment of osseointegration in patients with total absence of teeth] Stomatologiya = Stomatology, 2013, no.3, pp. 100-104.

10. Rozhnov S.M., Lomakin M.V. [The teeth and implant consistence: the morphometric characteristics in comparison with design features] Rossiiskaya stomatologiya = Russian Stomatology, 2015, no.2, pp.49-57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17116/rosstomat20158249-57

11. Ukhanov M.M. [The Periotest. The method of quantitative and dynamic assessment of the periodontium and osseointegration of dental implants] Available at: www.dental-revue.ru

12. World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki. Available at: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html

13. Mahesh L., Narayan T.V., Kostakis G., Shukla S. Periotest Values of Implants Placed in Sockets Augmented with Calcium Phosphosilicate Putty Graft: A Comparative Analysis against Implants Placed in Naturally Healed Sockets // J Contemp Dent Pract, 2014. Vol.15(2). P. 181-185.

14. Markovic A., Calvo-Guirado J.L., Lazic Z. et al. Evalution of primary stability of self-tapping and non-self-tapping dental implants. A 12-week clinical study // Clin Implant Dent Relat Res., 2013. Vol.15(3). P. 341-349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00415.x.

15. Mistry G., Shetty O., Shetty Sh., Singh R.D. Measuring implant stability: A review of different methods // Journal of Dental Implants, 2014. Vol.4. Issue 2. P. 165-169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-6781.140891

16. Sarve P.H., Kulkarni D., Shetty L. et al. Osseointegration in dental implants: A review // International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 2016. Vol. 7. Issue 12. P. 14696-14699.

17. Shibata Y., Tanimoto Y. A review of improved fixation methods for dental implants-part I: surface optimization for rapid osseointegration // Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2015. Vol. 59. No. 1. P. 20-33.

18. Stadlinger B., Korn P., Tödtmann N. et al. Osseointegration of biochemically modified implants in an osteoporosis rodent model // European Cells & Materials, 2013, Vol. 25. P. 326-340.

19. Terheyden H., Lang N.P., Bierbaum S., Stadlinger B. Osseointegration-communication of cells // Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2012. Vol. 23. No. 10. P. 1127-1135. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02327.x


Login or Create
* Forgot password?