Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
employee
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
employee
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
student
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
student
Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
UDC 616.31
Currently, tooth extraction is the most common surgical procedure performed in an outpatient setting. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a proprietary technique for atraumatic tooth extraction based on a staged, controlled intervention on the ligamentous apparatus with the activation of alteration processes to create optimal conditions for immediate dental implant placement. Materials and methods. A prospective comparative study was conducted, including 60 patients requiring surgical extraction of teeth in the mandible. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: a study group (n = 30), in which extractions were performed using the proprietary technique with the activation of alteration processes, and a comparison group (n = 30), in which a classical extraction technique using forceps and elevators was used. To evaluate the effectiveness of the techniques, a visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess pain, measure surgical time, assess bone volume immediately after extraction and at 3 months, record intra- and postoperative complications, and assess quality of life using the OHIP-14 questionnaire. Statistical data processing was performed using the SPSS 23.0 software package. Results. The study demonstrated statistically significant advantages of the proprietary atraumatic tooth extraction technique compared to the classical approach. The main advantage of the developed technique lies in the targeted activation of natural biological processes—alteration and subsequent reparation. With atraumatic tooth extraction, we noted a significant reduction in surgical time and blood loss, a significant reduction in the complications, and improvements in quality of life indicators according to the OHIP-14 questionnaire. In the main group, which underwent atraumatic extraction, implants were placed in 28 patients, while in the comparison group, which underwent conventional extraction, implants could be placed in only 20 patients. The results confirm not only the clinical but also the psychological effectiveness of the proprietary method, which aligns with modern understanding of the quality of medical care and serves as a preventative measure for the development of adverse intra- and postoperative events.
atraumatic tooth extraction, activation of alteration, repair, immediate dental implantation, blood clot formation
1. Galloway S.S., Earley E.T. Minimizing equine tooth extraction complications. Minimizing equine tooth extraction complications. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice. 2020;36(3):641-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2020.08.004
2. Plotino G., Abella Sans F., Duggal M.S., Grande N.M., Krastl G., Nagendrababu V. et al. Present status and future directions: Surgical extrusion, intentional replantation and tooth autotransplantation. International endodontic journal. 2022;55(Suppl 3):827-842. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13723
3. Ali T.A.A., Pohoden'ko-Chudakova I.O., Kuznecov Ya.O. Obosnovaniya napravlennogo issledovaniya gigienicheskogo sostoyaniya tret'ih molyarov i polosti rta v celom u pacientov s planiruemym slozhnym atipichnym udaleniem zubov, a takzhe u lic s travmaticheskimi perelomami chelyustey. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2021;(3):38-41. [Abdulameer A.A.T., Pohodenko Ch.I., Kuznetsov Ya. Basis for study of hygienic condition for third molars and oral cavity for patients with complex atypical tooth extraction and traumatic fractures of jaws. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2021;(3):38-41. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47272056
4. Sarafidou K., Lazaridi I., Gotsis S., Kirmanidou Y., Vasilaki D., Hirayama H. et al. Tooth preservation vs. extraction and implant placement in periodontally compromised patients: A systematic review and analysis of studies. Journal of prosthodontics. 2022;31(8):e87-e99. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13560
5. Rahmanov Ya.A., Habadze Z.S., Machin A., Borlakova M.M., Fedotova N.N., Dashtieva M.Yu. Metody profilaktiki i lecheniya al'veolita lunki. Endodontiya Today. 2022;20(3):255-259. [Rakhmanov Ya.A., Khabadze Z.S., Machin A., Borlakova M.M., Fedortova N.N., Dashtieva M.Yu. Methods of prevention and treatment of alveolar osteitis. Endodontics Today. 2022;20(3):255-259. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.36377/1726-7242-2022-20-3-255-259
6. Nozdrachev V.G., Erokina N.L., Mironov A.Yu., Sanin S.K. Atravmatichnoe udalenie zubov pered operaciey neposredstvennoy implantacii. Dental Forum. 2022;(4):65-66. [Nozdrachev V.G., Erokina N.L., Mironov A.Yu., Sanin S.K. Atraumatic extraction of teeth before direct dental implantation. Dental Forum. 2022;(4):65-66. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49753198
7. Nikol'skiy V.Yu., Vel'dyaksova L.V., Maksyutov A.E. Ocenka stepeni atrofii kostnoy tkani chelyustey posle udaleniya zubov v svyazi s dental'noy implantaciey. Saratovskiy nauchno-medicinskiy zhurnal. 2011;7(1):306-307. [Nikolsky V.Yu., Vel`dyaksova L.V., Maksyutov A.E. Assessment atrophy jawbone after tooth extraction in connection with dental implantation. Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2011;7(1):306-307. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16910029
8. Shinkevich D.S., Afanas'ev V.V. Osobennosti udaleniya retinirovannyh zubov u gematologicheskih bol'nyh. Stomatologiya. 2019;98(6):121‑123. [Shinkevich D.S., Afanas'ev V.V. Impacted teeth extraction in patients with hematological disorders. Stomatology. 2019;98(6):121‑123. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201998061121
9. Domic D., Bertl K., Lang T., Pandis N., Ulm C., Stavropoulos A. Hyaluronic acid in tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical trials. Clinical oral investigations. 2023;27(12):7209-7229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05227-4
10. Kuzin A.V., Vasil'ev Yu.L., Voronkova V.V., Stafeeva M.V. Klinicheskie rekomendacii k vyboru metodov obezbolivaniya zubov nizhney chelyusti v terapevticheskoy stomatologii. Endodontiya Today. 2015;(1):52-57. [Kuzin A.V., Vasiliev Yu.L., Voronkova V.V., Stafeeva M.V. Clinical recommendations for the choice of methods of anesthesia of teeth of the lower jaw in therapeutic dentistry. Endodontics Today. 2015;(1):52-57. (In Russ.)]. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23504946
11. Rabinovich S.A., Vasil'ev Yu.L., Kuzin A.N. Anatomicheskoe obosnovanie klinicheskoy effektivnosti provodnikovoy anestezii vnutrikostnoy chasti podborodochnogo nerva. Stomatologiya. 2018;97(2):41‑43. [Rabinovich S.A., Vasilyev Yu.L., Kuzin A.N. Anatomic rationale for clinical efficacy of intraosseous mental nerve anesthesia. Stomatology. 2018;97(2):41‑43. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=34956501
12. Daraushe H.M., Vasil'ev Yu.L., Kashtanov A.D., Lyakisheva A.A., Lezhnev D.A., Panin A.M. Rentgenanatomicheskoe obosnovanie vybora optimal'noy traektorii provodnikovoy anestezii na nizhney chelyusti. Operativnaya hirurgiya i klinicheskaya anatomiya (Pirogovskiy nauchnyy zhurnal). 2022;6(2):5‑12. [Daraushe Kh.M., Vasil’ev Yu.L., Kashtanov A.D., Lyakisheva A.A., Lezhnev D.A., Panin A.M. X-ray anatomical provement of the right trajectory choice during mandible regional anaesthesia. Russian Journal of Operative Surgery and Clinical Anatomy. 2022;6(2):5‑12. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/operhirurg202260215
13. Cen Y., Huang X., Liu J., Qin Y., Wu X., Ye S. et al. Application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology in dentistry: a narrative review. BMC oral health. 2023;23(1):630. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03142-4
14. Couso-Queiruga E., Graham Z.A., Peter T., Gonzalez-Martin O., Galindo-Moreno P., Avila-Ortiz G. Effect of periodontal phenotype characteristics on post-extraction dimensional changes of the alveolar ridge: A prospective case series. Journal of clinical periodontology. 2023;50(5):694-706. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13781
15. Dietrich T., Schmid I., Locher M., Addison O. Extraction force and its determinants for minimally invasive vertical tooth extraction. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2020;105:103711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103711
16. Muska E., Walter C., Knight A., Taneja P., Bulsara Y., Hahn M. et al. Atraumatic vertical tooth extraction: a proof of principle clinical study of a novel system. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology. 2013;116(5):e303-e310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.037
