COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY

Artem IZOSIMOV; Airat Aminev; Dmitriy Dvorskiy

doi:10.18481/2077-7566-2026-22-2-110-114

VAK Russia 3.1.7 UDC 616.31 CSCSTI 76.29

3 more Collapse

COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY

Published in Actual problems in dentistry · Volume 22, Issue 2 · Pages 110–114 · Rubric: SURGICAL DENTISTRY AND IMPLANTOLOGY. ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2026-22-2-110-114

Received: 15.05.2026 Accepted: 23.05.2026 Published: 29.06.2026 Language of publication: RUS

Authors

Artem IZOSIMOV

Airat Aminev

ORCID

Dmitriy Dvorskiy

ORCID

Artem IZOSIMOV

Academic degree: candidate of medical sciences

Science rang: docent

Bashkir State Medical University assistant professor · Department of Children's Dentistry and Orthodontics · Russian Federation · Ufa

Airat Aminev

Bashkirian State Medical University Ufa

ORCID

Dmitriy Dvorskiy

Bashkirian State Medical University Ufa

ORCID

ABSTRACT

Subject. The dependence of primary stability of dental implants on the macro design and surface treatment method. Objectives. Comparing the primary stability of dental implants in different bone types depending on surface structure and macro design. Methodology. The study was conducted at the Department of Surgical Dentistry of Bashkir State Medical University. Four models of implants were used (Dentium SuperLine, Dental Synthesis NCTI, Dental Synthesis NCTI surface PEO, Dental Synthesis Synthes Pro), 12 units each, size 4.0×8 mm. Placement was performed in artificial bone blocks 3B Biomechanical with density D1–D4. Primary stability was assessed using the resonance frequency analysis method by determining the implant stability quotient (ISQ) using a Penguin RFA device. Results. In dense bone type D1, the implant with the NitroEX surface treatment method demonstrated lower ISQ values (70; p ≤ 0.05). In bone types D2 and D3, primary stability did not differ significantly. In soft bone type D4, higher ISQ values were observed in implants with a square thread profile (42.75 and 44; p ≤ 0.05), while specimens with V-shaped thread showed lower ISQ (39.25 and 38.75; p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions. Macro design and surface treatment method have different effects depending on the bone type. In D1 bone, macro design and surface treatment had a significant effect. The implant with NitroEX surface treatment showed significantly lower stability compared to implants with S.L.A. and PEO treatment. In D2 and D3 bone, the influence of macro design and surface treatment was negligible — primary stability differed insignificantly. In D4 bone, implants with a square thread profile demonstrated significantly higher ISQ values (42.75 and 44; p ≤ 0.05).

KEYWORDS

dental implants, primary stability, implant surface, thread design, RFA analysis, ISQ, osseointegration

Funding

Bashkir State Medical University, Department of Surgical Dentistry, Ufa University of Science and Technology

1. Resnik R.R. Misch's Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 4th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier Inc.; 2021. 1264 p. https://books.google.ru/books?id=2w3MDwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=ru#v=onepage&q&f=false

2. Wang J.Q., Zhang Y., Pang M., Wang Y.Q., Yuan J., Peng H. et al. Biomechanical Comparison of Six Different Root-Analog Implants and the Conventional Morse Taper Implant by Finite Element Analysis. Frontiers in genetics. 2022;13:915679. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.915679

3. Ostapovich A.A., Ivashenko S.V., Drik F.G., Shpak I.I. Ctabil'nost' dental'nyh implantatov v processe ih osteointegracii po dannym golograficheskoy interferometrii. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2021;(2):68-72. [Astapovich A., Ivashenka S., Drik F., Shpak I. Stability of dental implants during their osseointegration according to holographic interferometry data. Sovremennaya stomatologiya. 2021;(2):68-72. (In Russ.)]. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/stabilnost-dentalnyh-implantatovv-protsesse-ih-osteointegratsii-po-dannym-golograficheskoy-interferometrii/viewer

4. Mahmudov T.G. Koefficient stabil'nosti dental'nyh implantatov i ego svyaz' s biomarkerami kostnogo metabolizma. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2020;(3):61-65. [Mahmudov T.G. The stability coefficient of dental implants and its relationship with biomarkers of bone metabolism. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2020;(3):61–65. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.37988/1811-153X_2020_3_61

5. Ayub F.A., Sunarso S., Dewi R.S. The Influence of Implant Macro-geometry in Primary Stability in Low-Density Bone: An in vitro Study. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. 2025;15(2):134-143. https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_155_24

6. Ganeles J., Norkin F., Dias D., Fava P., Levine R., Aranguren L. Implant shapes and macro-designs: advantages and disadvantages. Forum implantologicum. 2021;17(1):44-57. https://doi.org/10.3290/iti.fi.45624

7. Rukovodstvo pol'zovatelya Dentium. [Dentium User Manual. (In Russ.)]. Dostupno na / Available from: https://implantium.ru/files/dentium_manual.pdf

8. Katalog Dental Synthesis 15.07.2022. [Dental Synthesis Catalog 15.07.2022. (In Russ.)]. Dostupno na / Available from: https://nct.dental/upload/iblock/b8c/a2uv27k5uxdpxu3ar21cy2g1ev2x0bkj.pdf

9. Dental Synthesis: Nauchno-issledovatel'skaya proizvodstvennaya gruppa, ob'edinyayuschaya v sebe uchenyh, vrachey, fizikov i biologov. Nauchnye stat'i Dental Synthesis. [Dental Synthesis: A research and production group that brings together scientists, doctors, physicists and biologists. Scientific articles Dental Synthesis. (In Russ.)]. Dostupno na / Available from: https://synthesis.dental/doctor/article.php

10. Dental Synthesis: Nauchno-issledovatel'skaya proizvodstvennaya gruppa, ob'edinyayuschaya v sebe uchenyh, vrachey, fizikov i biologov. Dental'nyy implant Synthes Pro. [Dental Synthesis: A research and production group that brings together scientists, doctors, physicists and biologists. Synthes Pro dental implant. (In Russ.)]. Dostupno na / Available from: https://synthesis.dental/doctor/products/synthespro.php

11. Parfenov E.V., Raab G.I., Dyuryagin V.S. Primenenie nanotitana v dental'nyh implantatah. Dental'naya implantologiya i hirurgiya. 2022;(2):80-82. [Parfenov E.V., Raab G.I., Dyuryagin V.S. Application of nanotitanium in dental implants. Dentalʹnaâ implantologiâ i hirurgiâ. 2022;(2):80-82. (In Russ.)]. https://synthesis.dental/upload/iblock/f9b/u69zrgivtip7eknt4sl9db5jr66yl6bh.pdf

12. Katalog produkcii Dentium. [Dentium Product Catalog. (In Russ.)]. Dostupno na / Available from: https://implantium.ru/files/dentium_catalog.pdf

13. Dental Synthesis: Nauchno-issledovatel'skaya proizvodstvennaya gruppa, ob'edinyayuschaya v sebe uchenyh, vrachey, fizikov i biologov. [Dental Synthesis: A research and production group that brings together scientists, doctors, physicists and biologists. (In Russ.)]. Dostupno na / Available from: https://synthesis.dental/

14. Braylovskaya T.V., Verbo E.V., Abramyan S.V., Deniev A.M., Tangieva Z.A. Rezul'taty dental'noy implantacii u pacientov posle rekonstruktivno-vosstanovitel'noy hirurgii s primeneniem revaskulyarizirovannyh autotransplantatov po dannym rezonansno-chastotnogo analiza. Plasticheskaya hirurgiya i esteticheskaya medicina. 2020;(4):23-33. [Brailovskaya T.V., Verbo E.V., Abramyan S.V., Deniev A.M., Tangiyeva Z.A. Dental implantation outcomes after reconstructive surgery with vascularized autotransplants according to resonance-frequency analysis data. Plastic Surgery and Aesthetic Medicine. 2020;(4):23‑33. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/plast.hirurgia202004123

15. Yamaguchi Y., Shiota M., Fujii M., Shimogishi M., Munakata M. Effects of implant thread design on primary stability—a comparison between single- and double-threaded implants in an artificial bone model. International journal of implant dentistry. 2020;6(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-020-00239-1

16. Jin Z.H., Peng M.D., Li Q. The effect of implant neck microthread design on stress distribution of peri-implant bone with different level: A finite element analysis. Journal of dental sciences. 2020;15(4):466-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.12.003

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

JATS XML

Editor in Chief

Sergey Zholudev

zholudev_se@mail.ru

Deputy editor

Yuliya Mandra

jmandra@mail.ru

111

downloads

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons

GOST

IZOSIMOV A. A., Aminev A. R., Dvorskiy D. V. COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY // Actual problems in dentistry. 2026. no. 2. pp. 110-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2026-22-2-110-114. (Date of access 12.10.2026).

MLA

Artem IZOSIMOV, Aminev A. R., Dvorskiy D. V.. "COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY." Actual problems in dentistry 22.2 (2026): 110-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2026-22-2-110-114.

APA

IZOSIMOV A. A., Aminev A. R., Dvorskiy D. V. (2026). COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY. Actual problems in dentistry, 22(2), 110-114. https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2026-22-2-110-114

Chicago

Artem IZOSIMOV, Aminev A. R., Dvorskiy D. V.. "COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY." Actual problems in dentistry 22, no. 2 (2026): 110-114. https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2026-22-2-110-114.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = IZOSIMOV A. A., Aminev A. R., Dvorskiy D. V. | title = COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY | journal = Actual problems in dentistry | year = 2026 | volume = 22 | issue = 2 | pages = 110-114 | doi = 10.18481/2077-7566-2026-22-2-110-114 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

COMPARISON OF IMPLANT SURFACE AND DESIGN AND THE IMPACT OF THEIR PROCESSING ON PRIMARY STABILITY

Confirmation