1. Bimbas E.S., Klevakin A.Yu. Sravnitel'nyy analiz effektivnosti primeneniya apparata Gerbsta i monobloka pri lechenii distal'noy okklyuzii v sochetanii s nes'emnoy ortodonticheskoy tehnikoy. Problemy stomatologii. 2011;3:58-60. [E.S. Bimbas, A.Yu. Klevakin. Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the device Herbst and candy bar in the treatment of distal occlusion in conjunction with fixed orthodontic appliances. Actual problems in dentistry. 2011;3:58-60. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16395282

2. Vodolackiy V.M., Makatov R.S. Sravnitel'nyy analiz retencionnogo perioda u pacientov detskogo vozrasta s distal'noy i mezial'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov. Stomatologiya detskogo vozrasta i profilaktika. 2019;3(71):17-20. [V.M. Vodolatsky, R.S. Makatov. Comparative analysis of retention period in children with distal and mesial occlusion of dentition. Pediatric dentistry and prophylaxis. 2019;3(71):17-20. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2019-19-3-17-20

3. Danilova M.A., Ishmurzin P.V., Zaharov S.V. Primenenie geometricheskih modeley verhney i nizhney chelyustey, visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava dlya opisaniya izmeneniy chelyustnogo kompleksa v norme i pri distal'noy okklyuzii. Ortodontiya. 2012;1(57):15-19. [M.A. Danilova, P.V. Ishmurzin, S.V. Zakharov. Use of maxilla, mandible and temporomandibular joint geometrical models of maxillary complex description in norm and at distal occlusion. Orthodontics. 2012;1(57):15-19. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21010109

4. Danilova M.A., Ishmurzin P.V., Zaharov S.V. Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie miofunkcional'noy korrekcii sagittal'nyh anomaliy okklyuzii i disfunkcii visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava. Stomatologiya. 2012;3(91):65-69. [M.A. Danilova, P.V. Ishmurzin, S.V. Zakharov. The theoretical substantiation of myofunctional correction of sagittal occlusion abnormalities and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Stomatology. 2012;3(91):65-69. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18022662

5. Ishmurzin P.V., Danilova M.A. Lechenie distal'noy okklyuzii zubnyh ryadov, sochetannoy s disfunkciey visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava. Problemy stomatologii. 2012;1:70-71. [P.V. Ishmurzin, M.A. Danilova. Treatment of distoocclusion combined with temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Actual problems in dentistry. 2012;1:70-71. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17651443

6. Kosyuga S.Yu., Sirotkina S.V. Lechenie distal'nogo prikusa u detey. Stomatologiya dlya vseh. 2020;1(90):52-55. [S.Yu. Kosyuga, S.V. Sirotkina. Treatment of distal occlusion in children. International dental review. 2020;1(90):52-55. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.35556/idr-2020-1(90)52-55

7. Megrabyan O.A., Danilova M.A., Ishmurzin P.V., Alekseev E.A. Osobennosti patogeneticheskogo lecheniya pacientov s distal'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov, associirovannoy s retrognatiey nizhney chelyusti. Dental forum. 2018;4:47-48. [O.A. Megrabyan, M.A. Danilova, P.V. Ishmurzin, E.V. Alekseev. Pathogenic treatment characteristics of distal occlusion with mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism. Dental forum. 2018;4:47-48. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36320819

8. Megrabyan O.A., Ishmurzin P.V. Taktika lecheniya retro- i mikrognatii nizhney chelyusti u pacientov s nezavershennym rostom licevogo skeleta. Problemy stomatologii. 2019;15(3):103-109. [O.A. Megrabyan, P.V. Ishmurzin Treatment management of patients with mandibular micrognathia and retrognathism in incompleted facial skeleton growth period. Actual problems in dentistry. 2019;15(3):103-109. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2019-15-3-103-109.

9. Novruzov Z.G., Alieva R.K., Garaev Z.I. Cefalometricheskiy analiz effektivnosti lecheniya distal'nogo prikusa apparatom Frenkel'-2. Stomatologiya. 2020;99(1):49-54. [Z.G. Novruzov, R.K. Aliyeva, Z.I. Garayev. Cephalometric analysis of influence of the Frankel-2 appliance in the treatment of distal malocclusion. Stomatology. 2020;99(1):49-54. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat20209901149.

10. Novruzov Z.G., Alieva R.K., Ozdiler O.E. Cefalometricheskaya ocenka vliyaniya s'emnyh funkcional'nyh apparatov, ispol'zuemyh pri lechenii distal'nogo prikusa, na vysotu lica. Stomatologiya. 2018;97(3):44-47. [Z.G. Novruzov, R.K. Alieva, O.E. Ozdiler. Cephalometric evaluation of the effect of dynamax and monoblock appliances on vertical facial height in patients with distal malocclusion. Stomatology. 2018;97(3):44-47. (In Russ.)]. https://doi.org/10.17116/stomat201897344.

11. Pol'ma L.V., Karpova S.V., Topol'nickaya Ya.O., Fomichev K.A. Obosnovanie primeneniya korrektorov u vzroslyh pacientov s distal'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov. Ortodontiya. 2020;2(90):28-43. [L.V. Polma, V.S. Karpova, Ya.O. Topolnitskaya, K.A. Fomichev. Evidence of use of occlusion correctors in adult class II patients. Orthodontics. 2020;2(90):28-43. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44374379

12. Pol'ma L.V., Markova M.V., Oborotistov N.Yu. Distal'naya okklyuziya zubnyh ryadov: odno ili dvuhetapnoe lechenie? Ortodontiya. 2013;2(62):14-25. [L.V. Polma, M.V. Markova, N.Yu. Oborotistov. Analysis of orthodontic treatment of patients with distal occlusion: one-or two-stage treatment? Orthodontics. 2013;2(62):14-25. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21012976

13. Pol'ma L.V., Markova M.V., Persin L.S. Vybor optimal'nogo vremeni lecheniya pacientov s distal'noy okklyuziey zubnyh ryadov na osnovanii ocenki stadiy sozrevaniya pozvonkov sheynogo otdela. Ortodontiya. 2011;4(56):22-30. [L.V. Polma, M.V. Markova, L.S. Persin. Determining the optimal time for patients with distal occlusion by use of cervical vertebral maturation method. Orthodontics. 2011;4(56):22-30. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18760560

14. Popov S.A. Izmenenie licevogo otdela cherepa i myagkih tkaney lica pri sovremennom lechenii distal'noy okklyuzii u podrostkov s razlichnymi zubochelyustnymi anomaliyami. Klinicheskaya stomatologiya. 2011;3(59):84-86. [S.A. Popov. Changes of facial skeleton and soft tissues of face in the course of modern treatment of distal occlusion in teenagers suffering from different dentofacial anomalies. Clinical Dentistry. 2011;3(59):84-86. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22625373

15. Rubnikovich S.P., Kuz'menko E.V., Timchuk Ya.I., Hmazh Z.A., Kalkan E. Effektivnost' primeneniya funkcional'nogo s'emnogo apparata tvin-blok dlya lecheniya skeletnyh form anomaliy prikusa II klassa v period aktivnogo rosta. Stomatolog. Minsk. 2021;1(40):8-19. [S.P. Rubnikovich, E.V. Kuzmenko, Ya.I. Timchuk, Z.A. Khmaj, E. Kalkan. Effectiveness of twin-block functional removable appliance in treating skeletal class II malocclusion during the phase of active skeletal growth. Dentist. Minsk. 2021;1(40):8-19. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=44878319

16. Areepong D., Kim K.B., Oliver D.R., Ueno H. The Class II Carriere Motion appliance // The Angle Orthodontist. - 2020;90(4):491-499. https://doi.org/10.2319/080919-523.1

17. Baccetti T., Franchi L., Toth L.R., McNamara Jr. J.A. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2000;118(2):159-170. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.10557

18. Campbell C., Millett D., Kelly N., Cooke M., Cronin M. Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial // The Angle Orthodontist. - 2020;90(2):202-208. https://doi.org/10.2319/042419-290.1.

19. Clark W.J. Twin Blocks designed for 24-hour wear // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 156(3):295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.006.

20. Cozza P., Baccetti T., Franchi L. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2006;129(5):599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010

21. Jena A.K., Duggal R., Parkash H. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2006;130(5):594-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.02.025.

22. Lykhota K., Lykhota A., Petrychenko O. Comparison of economic efficiency of orthodontic appliances for treatment of sagittal bite anomalies // Georgian medical news. - 2019;295:48-51. PMID 31804198

23. Mills C.M., McCulloch K.J. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance // American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. - 2000;118(1):24-33. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.104902

24. Stefanovic N.L., Uhac M., Brumini M., Zigante M., Perkovic V., Spalj S. Predictors of patient compliance during Class II division 1 malocclusion functional orthodontic treatment // The Angle Orthodontist. - 2021;91(4):502-508. https://doi.org/10.2319/090820-780.1.

25. Taylor K.L., Evangelista K., Muniz L., Ruellas A.C.O. et al. Three-dimensional comparison of the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the Herbst and Pendulum appliances followed by fixed appliances: A CBCT study // Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research. - 2020;23(1):72-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12345

26. Veitz-Keenan A., Liu N. One phase or two phases orthodontic treatment for Class II division 1 malocclusion? // Evidence-Based Dentistry. - 2019;20(2):56-57. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-019-0035-4.

27. Wright D.M. Twin block functional therapy: a modified technique // Journal of General Orthodontics. - 1998;9(3):10-21. PMID: 10535031