Tver', Tver, Russian Federation
Tver', Tver, Russian Federation
Tver, Tver, Russian Federation
Tver, Tver, Russian Federation
Tver, Tver, Russian Federation
UDK 616.31 Стоматология. Заболевания ротовой полости и зубов
Methods for obtaining working and auxiliary dental impressions of patients have been revised in recent decades, which is associated with 3D scanning. At the same time, the policy of import substitution in dentistry is also developing quite actively, which is reflected in the introduction of domestic impression masses for analog prints into public health institutions. The aim of study. Reducing the number of complications of dental orthopedic treatment by optimizing the approach to choosing a method for obtaining a working anatomical impression. Methodology. Impressions of the mandible of 10 patients were obtained. 7 impressions were obtained from each patient using the most commonly used techniques, silicone impression materials and intraoral scanning. Further, jaw models of 4 types of plaster were made for each impression and scanned with an off-site dental scanner. With the help of a micrometer in the oral cavity, measurements of teeth 3.5, 4.4 and 4.2 were made according to the maximum vestibular-oral size of the clinical crown, which were taken as a standard. The reference size is compared with the dimensions obtained on digital models according to the selected parameters with an accuracy of up to thousandths of a millimeter. A statistical analysis of the data obtained was carried out. Results. The data obtained confirmed the manufacturer's claims about the accuracy of the impression masses. A slight decrease in the studied sizes was noted on the models obtained by intraoral scanning. Whereas on models obtained using silicone impressions, the dimensions, on the contrary, were slightly larger than the reference ones. A statistically significant difference was revealed when comparing models obtained using intraoral scanning and models obtained by laboratory scanning from analogues of jaws using silicone impressions. When comparing the data obtained with the standard, no critical differences were revealed. Conclusions. It is impossible to unequivocally assert the advantage of a digital or analog method of obtaining impressions in modern orthopedic dentistry. The method of obtaining an impression should be chosen depending on the indications for a particular type of treatment and clinical conditions.
silicone impressions, intraoral scanning, digital jaw models, types of impressions, digital dentistry
1. Apinsathanon P., Bhattarai B.P., Suphangul S., Wongsirichat N., Aimjirakul N. Penetration and Tensile Strength of Various Impression Materials of Vinylsiloxanether, Polyether, and Polyvinylsiloxane Impression Materials // Eur J Dent. - 2022;16(2):339-345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735793
2. Astashina N.B., Petrachev A.S., Kazakov S.V., Nemenatov I.G. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya cifrovyh tehnologiy na etapah ortopedicheskogo lecheniya pacientov s defektami tverdyh tkaney zubov. Problemy stomatologii. 2021;17(1):136-142. [N.B. Astashina, A.S. Petrachev, S.V. Kazakov, I.G. Nemenatov. The possibilities of using digital technologies at the stages of orthopedic treatment of patients with defects in hard dental tissues. Actual Problems in dentistry. 2021;17(1):136-142. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-20-17-1-136-142
3. Borodina I.D., Grigor'yanc L.S., Gadzhiev M.A.O., Apresyan S.S., Batov R.V., Stepanov A.G., Apresyan S.V. Sravnitel'naya ocenka tochnosti otobrazheniya zubnoy dugi pri pomoschi sovremennyh intraoral'nyh 3D-skanerov. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal. 2022;26(4):287-297. [I.D. Borodina, L.S. Grigoryants, M.A.O. Gadzhiev, S.S. Apresyan, R.V. Batov, A.G. Stepanov, S.V. Apresyan. Comparative assessment of the accuracy of the dental arch display using modern intraoral 3D scanners. Russian Dental Journal. 2022;26(4):287-297. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17816/1728-2802-2022-26-4-287-297
4. Galonskiy V.G., Surdo E.S., Chernov V.N. i dr. Cifrovye tehnologii v ortopedicheskoy stomatologii - sovremennoe sostoyanie voprosa v Rossii. Evolyucionnye etapy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya tehnologiy izgotovleniya zubnyh protezov (obzor literatury). Problemy stomatologii. 2022;18:1:5-18. [V.G. Galonsky, E.S. Surdo, V.N. Chernov et al. Digital technologies in orthopedic dentistry - the current state of the issue in Russia. Evolutionary stages of development and improvement of dental prosthesis manufacturing technologies (literature review). Actual Problems in dentistry. 2022;18:1:5-18. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-22-18-1-5-18
5. Zhulev E.N., Vokulova Yu.A. Ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya sravnitel'naya ocenka kachestva kraevogo prileganiya karkasov iskusstvennyh koronok, iz disilikata litiya, izgotovlennyh s pomosch'yu tradicionnyh i cifrovyh tehnologiy. Stomatologiya dlya vseh. 2020;3(92):4-9. [E.N. Zhulev, Yu.A. Vokulova. Orthopedic dentistry comparative assessment of the quality of the edge fit of artificial crown frames made of lithium disilicate, manufactured using traditional and digital technologies. Dentistry is for everyone. 2020;3(92):4-9. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35556/idr-2020-3(92)4-9
6. Zelikman H. et al. Effect of Mixing and Impression Techniques Using Vinyl Polysiloxane (VPS) on the Accuracy of Fixed Partial Dentures // Applied Sciences. - 2021;11(17):7845. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11177845
7. Zorina Yu.Yu., Oreshaka O.V., Ganisik A.V. Sovremennye vidy ottiskov v stomatologii (obzornaya stat'ya). Problemy stomatologii. 2022;18(3):32-39. [Yu.Yu. Zorina, O.V. Oreshaka, A.V. Ganisik. Modern types of impressions in dentistry (review article). Actual Problems in dentistry. 2022;18(3):32-39. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-2022-18-3-32-39
8. Zorina Yu.Yu., Oreshaka O.V., Ganisik A.V. Sravnitel'naya ocenka tochnosti ottiskov pri ortopedicheskom lechenii iskusstvennymi koronkami. Institut stomatologii. 2022;3(96):98-99. [Yu.Yu. Zorina, O.V. Oreshaka, A.V. Ganisik. Comparative assessment of the accuracy of impressions in orthopedic treatment with artificial crowns. Institute of Dentistry. 2022;3(96):98-99. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49483821
9. Koshelev K.A., Belousov N.N., Algoeva A.E., Bulanov V.I., Gerasimov A.M. Perspektivy primeneniya cifrovogo skanirovaniya v dinamicheskoy ocenke tkaney proteznogo lozha v ortopedicheskoy stomatologii. Problemy stomatologii. 2022;18(1):142-147. [K.A. Koshelev, N.N. Belousov, A.E. Algoeva, V.I. Bulanov, A.M. Gerasimov. Prospects for the use of digital scanning in the dynamic assessment of prosthetic bed tissues in orthopedic dentistry. Actual Problems in dentistry. 2022;18(1):142-147. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.18481/2077-7566-22-18-1-142-147
10. Koshelev K.A., Belousov N.N. Analiz otdalennyh rezul'tatov ortopedicheskogo lecheniya pacientov s chastichnoy poterey zubov nes'emnymi mostovidnymi protezami. Vestnik medicinskogo instituta "REAVIZ": reabilitaciya, vrach i zdorov'e. 2018;5(35):101-106. [K.A. Koshelev, N.N. Belousov. Analysis of long-term results of orthopedic treatment of patients with partial tooth loss with fixed bridges. Bulletin of the medical institute "REAVIZ": rehabilitation, doctor and health. 2018;5(35):101-106. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36871904
11. Oreshaka O.V., Ganisik A.V., Kruchihina Yu.Yu. Al'ternativnaya metodika polucheniya dvuhsloynogo ottiska pri nes'emnom zubnom protezirovanii. Global'nye problemy sovremennosti. 2020;1(10-12):63-69. [O.V. Oreshaka, A.V. Ganisik, Yu.Y. Kruchikhina. Alternative technique for obtaining a two-layer impression with non-removable dentures. Global problems of our time. 2020;1(10-12):63-69. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26787/nydha-2713-2048-2020-1-10-11-12-63-69
12. Parhomenko A.N., Shemonaev V.I. Izuchenie tochnosti prileganiya metallicheskih karkasov nes'emnyh zubnyh protezov v zavisimosti ot ih protyazhennosti. Vestnik Avicenny. 2022;24(3):344-352. [A.N. Parkhomenko, V.I. Shemonaev. Studying the accuracy of the fit of metal frames of fixed dentures depending on their length. Avicenna's Bulletin. 2022;24(3):344-352. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.25005/2074-0581-2022-24-3-344-352
13. Studenikin R.V., Mamedov A.A. Polnyy cikl cifrovizacii i avtomatizacii v stomatologicheskoy praktike. Stomatologiya dlya vseh. 2021;4(97):46-53. [R.V. Studenikin, A.A. Mammadov. The full cycle of digitalization and automation in dental practice. Dentistry is for everyone. 2021;4(97):46-53. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.35556/idr-2u21-4(97)46-52
14. Shvec M.V., Ganisik A.V., Dement'eva E.A.Opyt primeneniya cifrovyh tehnologiy dlya distancionnogo obucheniya studentov na kafedre ortopedicheskoy stomatologii altayskogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta. Evraziyskoe Nauchnoe Ob'edinenie. 2021;11-4(81):307-309. [M.V. Shvets, A.V. Ganisik, E.A. Dementieva. The experience of using digital technologies for distance learning of students at the Department of Orthopedic Dentistry of the Altai State Medical University. Eurasian Scientific Association. 2021;11-4(81):307-309. (In Russ.)]. https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=47416615
15. Shemonaev V.I., Mashkov A.V., Patrushev A.S., Lashakova A.V., Zhivotov D.S. Analiz tochnosti pripasovki nes'emnoy ortopedicheskoy konstrukcii s oporoy na dental'nye implantaty v zavisimosti ot metoda polucheniya ottiska. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo medicinskogo universiteta. 2019;1(69):69-73. [V.I. Shemonaev, A.V. Mashkov, A.S. Patrushev, A.V. Lashakova, D.S. Zhivotov. Analysis of the accuracy of packing a non-removable orthopedic structure based on dental implants, depending on the method of obtaining an impression. Bulletin of the Volgograd State Medical University. 2019;1(69):69-73. (In Russ.)]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.19163/1994-9480-2019-1(69)-69-73
16. Yazdanie N. et al. Comparison of Linear Dimensional Accuracy Between One Step and Two-step Impression Technique Using Polyvinyl Siloxane Impression Material // Journal of Gandhara Medical and Dental Science. - 2022;9(3):68-74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.9-3.134
