Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
Omsk, Omsk, Russian Federation
Omsk, Russian Federation
Background. The study of the area of the crown part of the tooth, especially its occlusal surface, as well as the degree of differentiation and reduction are of great importance when conducting reconstructive therapy, but unfortunately, these studies caused technical difficulties for researchers, it was not possible to mathematically determine the specifics of the surface and calculate it. In this study, we performed a morphometric study of tooth areas using modern methods of computer diagnostics and recording the data on electronic media. Objectives ― measuring the area of the occlusal surface of intact molars and human premolars with varying degrees of differentiation using modern scanning capabilities of complex surfaces. Methods. The object of the study was 200 teeth of intact teeth of individuals of the Caucasian race, aged 18 to 30 years (50 molars of the upper jaw, 50 molars of the upper jaw, 50 molars of the lower jaw, 50 molars of the lower jaw ), removed according to orthodontic and surgical (fracture of the jaw) indications. A morphometric study of tooth areas was carried out using modern methods of computer diagnostics, the Avantis 3D program and recording the data on electronic media. Results. Using modern methods of scanning human teeth, information has been obtained on the area of the occlusal surface of molars and premolars. Knowledge of the anatomical and topographic features of teeth, taking into account their individual microarchitectonics, is of great importance when conducting reconstructive therapy. Conclusions. The ability to restore the occlusal surface of the teeth with a different degree of differentiation will allow dentists to improve the technology of restoration of tooth crowns based on the principles of biomimetics, taking into account the morphofunctional features of the human dentition.
harmony, biomimetics, tooth anatomy, occlusal surface area measurements, modeling, composite materials
1. Boldyrev, Yu. V. (2017). Sotsial'naya znachimost' estetiko-funktsional'noy restavratsii zubov pryamym i nepryamym sposobami [The social significance of the aesthetic-functional restoration of teeth by direct and indirect methods]. Problemy stomatologii [Problems of Dentistry], 18 (2), 3-8. (In Russ.)
2. Gabuchan, A. V. (2011). Kliniko-eksperimental'noye obosnovaniye preparirovaniya okklyuzionnoy poverkhnosti zubov pri ortopedicheskom lechenii nes"yomnymi protezami [Clinical and experimental justification for the preparation of the occlusal surface of the teeth during orthopedic treatment with fixed prostheses: authoref. dis. ... cand. medical science]. Moscow, 22. (In Russ.)
3. Dawson, P. E. (2016). Funktsional'naya okklyuziya: ot visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava do planirovaniya ulybki [Functional occlusion: from the temporomandibular joint to the planning of a smile]. Moscow, 588. (in Russ.).
4. Zubov, A. A. (1999). Odontologiya v sovremennoy antropologii [Odontology in modern anthropology]. Moscow, 232. (In Russ.).
5. Lomiashvili, L. M. et al. (2014). Iskusstvo modelirovaniya i restavratsii zubov [The art of modeling and restoration of teeth]. Omsk, 436. (In Russ.).
6. Lomiashvili, L. M. et al. (2016). Iskusstvo modelirovaniya zubov [The art of modeling of teeth]. Omsk, 349. (In Russ.).
7. Mitin, N. E. et al. (2015). Klinicheskoye issledovaniye zhevatel'noy effektivnosti s primeneniyem komp'yuternogo analiza okklyuziogramm [A clinical study of masticatory effectiveness using computer analysis of occlusiograms]. Rossiyskiy stomatologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian Dental Journal], 19 (5), 25-27. (In Russ.).
8. Krueger-Janson, U. (2008). Forma, poverkhnost' i tsvet [Shape, surface and color]. Novoye v stomatologii [New in dentistry], 3, 16-34. (In Russ.).
9. Lebedenko, I. Yu., Bragin, E. A., Kalivrajiyan, E. S. (2015). Ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya [Orthopedic dentistry]. Moscow, 640. (In Russ.).
10. Leontyev, V. K. et al. (2009). Bank dannykh zubochelyustnoy sistemy [Dental and maxillary system data bank]. DentArt [DentArt], 2, 66-71. (In Russ.).
11. Leus, P. A. (2018). Diagnostika, lecheniye i profilaktika kariyesa zubov [Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of dental caries]. Minsk, 2018. (In Russ.).
12. Mashkova, N. G., Aistov, V. F., Kostin, R. A. (2018). Sravnitel'nyy analiz effektivnosti lecheniya stomatologicheskikh zabolevaniy pri diagnostike okklyuzionnykh kontaktov s pomoshch'yu artikulyatsionnoy bumagi i T-SCAN III [Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the treatment of dental diseases in the diagnosis of occlusal contacts using articulation paper and T-SCAN III]. Sovremennaya ortopedicheskaya stomatologiya [Modern orthopedic dentistry], 30, 26-29. (In Russ.).
13. Krikheli, N. I. et al. (2015). Metody obsledovaniya patsiyenta v esteticheskoy stomatologii [Methods of patient examination in aesthetic dentistry]. Moscow, 96. (In Russ.).
14. Mikhailovsky, S. G., Lomiashvili, L. M., Gileva, O. S., Ivanova, L. A., Polyakova, E. E. (2018). Effektivnost' modul'nykh tekhnologiy rekonstruktivnoy terapii zubov v kriteriyakh kachestva zhizni stomatologicheskogo patsiyenta [The effectiveness of modular technologies for reconstructive dental therapy in the criteria for the quality of life of a dental patient]. Institut stomatologii [Institute of Dentistry], 1 (78), 42-44. (In Russ.).
15. Postolaki, A., Testemitanu, N., Postolaki, I. (2012). Sovremennaya kontseptsiya o formoobrazovanii chelyustno-litsevoy sistemy cheloveka [The modern concept of the formation of the maxillofacial system of a person]. Chisinau, 64. (In Russ.)
16. Radlinsky, S. V. (2006). Biomekhanika zubov i restavratsiy [Biomechanics of teeth and restorations]. DentArt [DentArt], 2, 42-48. (In Russ.).
17. Ryakhovskiy, A. N. (2008). Forma i tsvet v esteticheskoy stomatologii [Form and color in aesthetic dentistry]. Moscow, 208. (In Russ.).
18. Tirlet, G. (2015). Osnovy kontseptsii biomimetiki [Fundamentals of the concept of biomimetics]. Problemy stomatologii [Problems of Dentistry], 3-4, 43-47. (In Russ.).
19. Dimova-Gabrovska, M. (2015). Contemporary tendencies and gnathological preconditions in diagnosis and rehabilitation of craniomandibular disorders : diss. … doc. med. science. Sofia, 197.
20. Dimova-Gabrovska, M. (2018). Thermographic Assessment of Structural Analysis in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders. Comptes rendus de l’Académie bulgare des Sciences, 71, 5, 712-716.
21. Liebgott, B. (2010). The anatomical basis of dentistry. Ney York : Elsevier, 528.
22. Magne, P., Belser, U. C. (2013). Porcelain versus composite inlays/onlays. Effects of mechanical loads on stress distribution, adhesion, and crown flexure. J. Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry, 23, 6, 543-555.
23. Manauta, J., Salat, A. (2012). Layers: An atlas of composite resin stratification. London : Quintessence, 448.
24. Pröschel, P., Hoffmann, M. (1988). Frontal chewing patterns of the incisor point and their dependence on the resistance of food and type of occlusion. J. Prosthet. Dent, 59, 617-624.
25. Stephen, J., Samuel, P. (2016). Diagnosis and treatment planning in dentistry. 3rd ed, Mosby, 459.
26. Terry, A. D., Geller, W. (2013). An esthetic and restorative dentistry: material selection and technique. London : Quintessence, 752.
27. Scolavino, S. et al. (2016). The simultaneous modeling technique. Int. J. Esthet. Dent, 11, 2-25.
