INFECTION CONTROL FOR PROSTHESIS ON DENTAL IMPLANTS. COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTICS
Rubrics: ORIGINAL STUDIES
Authors:
1.
Chelyabinskaya gosudarstvennaya medicinskaya akademiya
2.
South Ural State Medical University
(Department of Orthopedic Dentistry and Orthodontics, Vice-Rector for Strategic Development, Science and Innovation, Professor of the Department)
Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Chelyabinsk, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
Type:
Article
Pages:
from 43
to 46
Status:
Published
Received:
22.06.2015
Accepted:
22.06.2015
Published:
22.06.2015
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
implantation, temporary designs, esthetics, adhesive bridge-like artificial limb, metalplastic
Abstract (English):
for the period of osteointegration of dentalny implants to patients installation of temporary orthopedic designs was made: partial removable plastinochny artificial limb, adhesive bridge, plastic bridge, metalplastic bridge. After clinical supervision and questioning of patients optimum designs were determined by esthetic and functional requirements. for frontal department of the upper and lower jaw the most optimum design will be the adhesive bridge- like artificial limb, or the bridge-like artificial limb made of metalplastic. for lateral department of the upper and lower jaw – a bridge-like artificial limb from metalplastic, or a partial removable plastinochny artificial limb.
Keywords:
implantation, temporary designs, esthetics, adhesive bridge-like artificial limb, metalplastic
implantation, temporary designs, esthetics, adhesive bridge-like artificial limb, metalplastic
