Москва, г. Москва и Московская область, Россия
УДК 616.31-085 Методы лечения заболеваний полости рта
УДК 616.31 Стоматология. Заболевания ротовой полости и зубов
ГРНТИ 76.29 Клиническая медицина
Для полноценной работы стоматолога-имплантолога, занимающегося восполнением зубных рядов с помощью дентальных имплантатов и опирающихся на них протезов, в современных реалиях избыточной вариативности имплантологических систем и супраструктур для них клиницисту необходимо разбираться в критериях, которым должны соответствовать различные элементы конструкций вне зависимости от того, является ли конструкция единичным зубом, мостовидным протезом или полным зубным рядом, восстановленным указанной выше конструкцией. В соответствии с современными научными понятиями, на долгосрочную выживаемость имплантатов и зубов, восстановленных с их помощью, влияют различные механические и биологические факторы, такие, как переключение платформ, вид соединения абатмента с телом имплантата, включая конус, его угол, внутренний или внешний многогранник, вид и форма резьбы, покрытие винта, фиксирующего супраструктуру к шахте дентального имплантата (ДИ), состояние мягких тканей и другие факторы, раскрывающиеся в настоящей статье. Статья будет полезна стоматологам, которые занимаются восполнением зубных рядов с помощью различных видов протезов с опорой на ДИ для ознакомления с современными тенденциями и научно доказанными фактами о различных элементах комплекса «имплантат — протез». Также статья будет полезна для выбора клиницистом имплантологической системы, отвечающей современным критериям надежности и эффективности среди множества вариаций, представленных на рынке медицинских изделий. Коллектив авторов рекомендует статью к ознакомлению студентам старших курсов и ординаторам, обучающимся на стоматологических факультетах медицинских вузов, для более глубокого понимания условий, которые в ближайшем будущем должны будут учитываться ими в практике стоматолога-ортопеда или стоматолога-хирурга.
стоматология, зубной имплантат, зубной абатмент, конструкция зубного имплантата-абатмента, имплантология
1. Ramanauskaite A., Schwarz F., Sader R. Influence of width of keratinized tissue on the prevalence of peri-implant diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Clinical oral implants research. – 2022;33(23). https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35763022/
2. Adawi H.A. Effects of Blood Contamination and Decontamination Protocol on Reverse Torque Value of Abutment Screws in Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study // Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland). – 2023;8(2):157. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics8020157.
3. Ala L.A.B., Nogueira T.E., Leles C.R. One-year prospective study on single short (7-mm) implant overdentures in patients with severely resorbed mandibles // Clinical Oral Implants Research. – 2022;33(3):291-301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13887.
4. Ali D. Levels of interleukin 1-beta and soluble urokinase plasminogen activation factor in peri-implant sulcular fluid of cement - and screw-retained dental implants // Quintessence International (Berlin, Germany: 1985). – 2023;54(6):452-458. doi:https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b3877567.
5. Alnasser A.H. Effect of implant abutment screw materials and tightening protocols on reverse tightening values: An in vitro study // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2023:S0022-3913(23)00368-2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.05.018.
6. Aneksomboonpol P. Surface structure characteristics of dental implants and their potential changes following installation: a literature review // Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. – 2023;49(3):114-124. doi:https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2023.49.3.114.
7. Arabbeiki M., Niroomand M.R., Rouhi G. Improving dental implant stability by optimizing thread design: Simultaneous application of finite element method and data mining approach // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2023;130(4):602.e1-602.e11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.034.
8. Atieh M.A. Influence of implant restorative emergence angle and contour on peri-implant marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. – 2023;25(5):840-852. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13214.
9. Atlas A.M., Behrooz E., Barzilay I. Can bite-force measurement play a role in dental treatment planning, clinical trials, and survival outcomes? A literature review and clinical recommendations // Quintessence International. – 2022;53(7):632-642. doi:https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b3044939.
10. Bagegni A. The Mechanical Behavior of a Screwless Morse Taper Implant-Abutment Connection: An In Vitro Study // Materials (Basel, Switzerland). – 2022;15:3381. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093381
11. Batista R. et al. Deformation of implant retaining screws-Study with stereoscopic microscopy and microCT // Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry: Official Publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry – 2022;34(8):1147-1155. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12959
12. Bittencourt A.-B.-B.-C. Stress distribution of multiple implant-supported prostheses: Photoelastic and strain gauge analyses of external hexagon and morse taper connections // Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. – 2022;14:e235-e240. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59288
13. Block M.S. Evidence-Based Criteria for an Ideal Abutment Implant Connection-A Narrative Review // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Official Journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. – 2022;80(10):1670-1675. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.07.002
14. Canullo L. Tissue-level versus bone-level single implants in the anterior area rehabilitated with feather-edge crowns on conical implant abutments: An up to 5-year retrospective study // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2022;128(5):936-941. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.031
15. Cao W.-Y. Effects of two implant systems on peri-implant soft tissue // Shanghai Journal of Stomatology. – 2022;31(3):305-308. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36204962/
16. Dethier F. The Effects of Abutment Materials on Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Integration: A Study in Minipigs // Journal of Prosthodontics: Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists. – 2022;31:585-592. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13504
17. D’Orto B. Marginal Bone Loss Compared in Internal and External Implant Connections: Retrospective Clinical Study at 6-Years Follow-Up // Biomedicines. – 2023;11(4):1128. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11041128
18. Esfahanian V. Effect of Different Implant-Abutment Mismatches on Stress Distribution: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Study // The Journal of Oral Implantology. – 2022;48(5):370-374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00271
19. Felice P. Influence of Keratinized Tissue on Short Dental Implants: A Parallel Cohort Retrospective Study on 217 Implants with a Mean Follow-up of 4.1 Years // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2023;38(3):462-467. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9918
20. Gehrke S.A., Dedavid B.A., Prados-Frutos J.C. Effects of different switched or not-switched implant and abutment platform designs and marginal bone loss on fracture strength: An in vitro study // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2022;128(1):55-62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.038
21. Ghaffari T. Evaluation of implant abutment screw head deformation in hexagonal and star designs after successive tightening and loosening // Journal of Advanced Periodontology & Implant Dentistry. – 2023;15(1):60-63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34172/japid.2023.001
22. Grunau O., Terheyden H. Lateral augmentation of the sinus floor followed by regular implants versus short implants in the vertically deficient posterior maxilla: a systematic review and timewise meta-analysis of randomized studies // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2023;52(7):813-824. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2022.11.015
23. Gupta R., Gupta N., Weber D.D.S. Dental Implants. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) : StatPearls Publishing. 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29262027/
24. Gurbuz E., Ceylan E., Yurttas M. Evaluation of the significance of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant tissue health: a prospective clinical trial // Australian Dental Journal. – 2023;68(2):105-112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12955
25. Häggman-Henrikson B. Bruxism and dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. – 2023. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13567
26. Hamilton A. Implant prosthodontic design as a predisposing or precipitating factor for peri-implant disease: A review // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. – 2023;25(4):710-722. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13183
27. Hanozin B. Digital vs. conventional workflow for one-abutment one-time immediate restoration in the esthetic zone: a randomized controlled trial // International Journal of Implant Dentistry. – 2022;8(1):7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00406-6
28. Heimes D. How does dental implant macrogeometry affect primary implant stability? A narrative review // International Journal of Implant Dentistry. – 2023;9(1):20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00485-z
29. Hernández A.E. Assessment of Surgical and Radiographic Parameters for Abutment Height Selection: A Prospective Study with 1-Year Follow-up // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2022;37(5):1037-1043. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9446
30. Holanda Cavalcanti Pereira A.K. de. Mechanical behavior of titanium and zirconia abutments at the implant-abutment interface: A systematic review // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2022:S0022-3913(22)00050-6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.01.006
31. Juan-Montesinos A. Comparative Study by Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Peri-Implant Effect of Two Types of Platforms: Platform-Switching versus Conventional Platforms // Journal of Clinical Medicine. – 2022;11(6):1743. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061743
32. Kang Y. One-Abutment at One-Time in Posterior Edentulism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. – 2023. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000009428
33. Kim Y.-M. Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants // Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. – 2022;52(6):496-508. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2200960048
34. Kocak-Oztug N.A. Analysis of Biomarkers and Marginal Bone Loss in Platform-Switched and Nonplatform-Switched Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial // BioMed Research International. – 2022;2022:2603287. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2603287
35. Körtvélyessy G. Different Conical Angle Connection of Implant and Abutment Behavior: A Static and Dynamic Load Test and Finite Element Analysis Study // Materials (Basel, Switzerland). – 2023;16(5):1988. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051988
36. Kreve S. Relationship between dental implant macro-design and osseointegration: a systematic review // Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2022. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-022-01116-4
37. Kwan J.C., Kwan N. The Effects of a Vertical Compressive Cyclic Load on Abutment Screws and the Stability of the Prosthesis in Nonengaging and Partially Engaging Abutments in a Screw-Retained Splinted Fixed Dental Prosthesis // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2022;37(3):571-578. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9542
38. Lal S.J., Weber D.D.S. Bruxism Management StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) : StatPearls Publishing. 2023. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29494073/
39. Lemos C.A.A. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis // The Journal of Oral Implantology. – 2022;48(3):194-201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00328
40. Liu F. Biomechanical influence of thread form on stress distribution over short implants (≤6 mm) using finite element analysis // Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering. – 2022;67(1):53-60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2020-0215
41. Lombardo G. Short and ultra-short (<6-mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior areas (part II): A 5-year retrospective study on periodontally healthy patients and patients with a history of periodontitis // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. – 2022;24(4):455-467. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13103
42. Lorusso F. Microleakage and mechanical behavior of conical vs. internal hexagon implant-abutment connection under a cyclic load fatigue test // European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. – 2023;27(3):122-127. DOI:https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202304_31329
43. Manfredini D., Ahlberg J., Lobbezoo F. Bruxism definition: Past, present, and future - What should a prosthodontist know? // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2022;128(5):905-912. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.01.026
44. Mendes T.A. Wear of Titanium Implant Platforms with Different Abutment Connections and Abutment Materials: A Pilot Study // Journal of Functional Biomaterials. – 2023;14(4):178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14040178
45. Menini M. Comparison of Bone-Level and Tissue-Level Implants: A Pilot Study with a Histologic Analysis and a 4-Year Follow-up // The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. – 2022;42(4):535-543. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.4990
46. Mester A. Short Implants versus Standard Implants and Sinus Floor Elevation in Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials with ≥5 Years’ Follow-Up // Journal of Personalized Medicine. – 2023;13(2):169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13020169
47. Naguib G.H. The Effect of Implant Length and Diameter on Stress Distribution of Tooth-Implant and Implant Supported Fixed Prostheses: An In Vitro Finite Element Analysis Study // The Journal of Oral Implantology. – 2023;49(1):46-54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00023
48. Nourizadeh A. Comparison of reverse torque values of abutment screws with the application of oil-based and water-based antibacterial agents // Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects. – 2022;16(4):238-242. DOI:https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2022.038
49. Ortega-Martínez J. In vitro assessment of PEEK and titanium implant abutments: Screw loosening and microleakage evaluations under dynamic mechanical testing // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2022;127(3):470-476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.033
50. Ozkan A. Dental Implants and Implant Coatings: A Focus on Their Toxicity and Safety // Journal of Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology: Official Organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer. – 2023;42(2):31-48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1615/JEnvironPatholToxicolOncol.2022043467
51. Park D.-U. Screw-and-cement-retained prosthesis versus cement-retained prosthesis: Which is more appropriate for the upper premolar area? // Journal of Dental Sciences. – 2022;17(4):1553-1558. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2022.04.011
52. Raj H.K. Evaluation of Immediately Loaded Parallel Conical Connection Implants with Platform Switch in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Prospective Clinical Study // The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. – 2022;23(4):405-414. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35945833/
53. Rathe F. Influence of Anodizing Stages on the Preload Force of Implant-Abutment Screws and Their Benefits Regarding the Concept of Immediate Implant Placement-An In Vitro Study // Materials (Basel, Switzerland). – 2022;15(3):776. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15030776
54. Reis I.N.R.D. Influence of supracrestal tissue height on peri-implant hard and soft tissues of single implants placed in the esthetic area using the one abutment-one time approach: a 1-year prospective interventional study // Quintessence International (Berlin, Germany: 1985). – 2023;54(7):536-547. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.b4009377
55. Ren S. Crown Accuracy and Time Efficiency of Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Restorations in a Complete Digital Workflow: A Randomized Control Trial // Journal of Prosthodontics: Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists. – 2022;31(5):405-411. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13447
56. Ribeiro M.C. de O. Implant-supported crowns with locking taper implant-abutment connection: A systematic review and meta-analysis // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2022:S0022-3913(22)00379-1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.005
57. Rodrigues V.V.M. Is the clinical performance of internal conical connection better than internal non-conical connection for implant-supported restorations? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Journal of Prosthodontics: Official Journal of the American College of Prosthodontists. – 2023;32(5):382-391. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13655
58. Sagheb K. Preload and friction in an implant-abutment-screw complex including a carbon-coated titanium alloy abutment screw: an in vitro study // International Journal of Implant Dentistry. – 2023;9(1):8. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00473-3
59. Saleh M.H. The Prosthetic-Biologic Connection and Its Influence on Peri-implant Health: An Overview of the Current Evidence // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2022;37(4):690-699. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9523
60. Schoenbaum T.R. Implant-Abutment Connections and Their Effect on Implant Survival Rates and Changes in Marginal Bone Levels (Δ): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 45,347 Oral Implants // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2023;38:37-45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.10411
61. Selvamani N. In Vitro Comparison of Loss of Torque between Gold and Titanium Alloy Abutment Screws in Dental Implants without Any Cyclic Loads // The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. – 2022;23(8):801-806. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3388
62. Sezer T., Kilic K., Esim E. Effect of Implant Diameter and Bruxism on Biomechanical Performance in Maxillary All-on-4 Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Analysis // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2022;37(4):709-721. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9419
63. Silva R.C.S. Titanium Dental Implants: An Overview of Applied Nanobiotechnology to Improve Biocompatibility and Prevent Infections // Materials (Basel, Switzerland). – 2022;15(9):3150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15093150
64. Singh M. Evaluation of physical changes due to simulated loading on prosthetic screw supporting 4- and 6-unit implant prosthesis: An in vitro study // Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. – 2022;22(4):389-397. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4103/jips.jips_48_22
65. Sivaswamy V., Bahl V. Surface Modifications of Commercial Dental Implant Systems: An Overview // Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants. – 2023;33(2):71-77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2022042612
66. Tütüncüoğlu S. Clinical and biochemical evaluation of oral irrigation in patients with peri-implant mucositis: a randomized clinical trial // Clinical Oral Investigations. – 2022;26(1):659-671. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04044-x
67. Verma V., Hazari P., Verma P. Biomechanical efficiency of different implant-abutment connection: a systematic review of studies using photoelastic stress analysis // Evidence-Based Dentistry. – 2023;24(2):92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00884-6
68. Vigolo P. Influence of Platform-Switched Restoration on Bone Resorption in Patients Treated with Wide-Diameter, External-Hex-Connection Dental Implants: A 10-Year Follow-up Study // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. – 2023;38(1):46-52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.9744
69. Yang F. Abutment mechanical complications of a Morse taper connection implant system: A 1- to 9-year retrospective study // Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. – 2022;24(5):683-695. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13115
70. Yi Y. Mechanical complications of implant-supported restorations with internal conical connection implants: A 14-year retrospective study // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2023,129(5):732-740. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.053
